GOHERR assessment
From Testiwiki
This page is a assessment.
The page identifier is Op_en7148 |
|---|
| Moderator:Päivi Haapasaari (see all) |
| This page is a stub. You may improve it into a full page, and then a rating bar will appear here. |
| Upload data
|
Contents
Scope
Question
Intended use and users
Participants
- University of Helsinki: Sakari Kuikka, Päivi Haapasaari, Suvi Ignatius, Kirsi Hoviniemi
- National Institute for Health and Welfare (THL): Jouni Tuomisto, Arja Asikainen
- University of Oulu: Timo P. Karjalainen, Simo Sarkki, Mia Pihlajamäki
- Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU): Anna Gårdmark, Johan Östergren, Magnus Huss, Andreas Bryhn
- University of Aalborg/Innovative Fisheries Management (IFM-AAU): Alyne Delaney, Jesper Raakjaer
- Stakeholders needed in the assessment: fisher's associations, agricultural/fisheries ministries in Finland, Sweden, Estonia, Denmark.
Boundaries
- Time considered: 2015 - 2040.
- Area considered: Sweden, Finland, Denmark, Estonia. For detailed herring/salmon stock modelling, only the Bothnian Sea and Gulf of Bothnia is considered.
- Policies considered: We will build and explore four integrative scenarios for the future of Baltic salmon and herring. See Management of Baltic salmon and herring.
- Outcomes considered: threats to and state of the fish stocks; impacts and governance responses. See Stakeholders' objectives about Baltic salmon and herring.
Decisions and scenarios
See Management of Baltic salmon and herring. A subset that can be modelled is included in this assessment.
Possible management options:
- International agreement on fishing quota for salmon
- Size-selective fishing of herring
- Knowledge actions and fish recommendations
- Agricultural policy
- Dioxin policy
- Etc
Timing
The assessment started in April 2015. The first stakeholder meeting will be in February 2016. The final results with the full decision support tool will be finalised in March 2018.
Answer
The work has just started. There is no answer yet.
Results
Conclusions
Rationale
Stakeholders
Who will be affected by the decisions?
- Professional fishers and their organisations
- Anglers and other recreational fishers and their organisations
- Land owner fishers and their organisation (they have inherited rights)
- Saami people also have inherited rights (in Sweden only?)
- Food and fish industry.
- Mink and fox farmers
- All people utilising recreational values of the Baltic Sea (relates to eutrophication)
- Farmers and agricultural sector
- Consumers of fish
- Producers of fish oil and fish meal
- Baltic Sea RAC (Regional Advisory Concil) represents fishers (located in Copenhagen)
- Hydropower plant owners
Who will affect the decisions?
- Food safety organisations (EVIRA, Livsmedelsverket, ...)
- Ministries (of agriculture, environment, and commerce)
- EU: DG Mare, EU Parliament?
- SWAM (Swedish Agency for Marine and Water Management)
Who are interested in the decisions?
- Scientists
- Environmental NGOs
- Bureaucrats
- ICES (International Council for the Exploration of the Sea)
- Helcom
Dependencies
| From | To | Deadline | Page | Topic |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WP2 | WP3 | Stakeholders' objectives about Baltic salmon and herring | Stakeholder values and objectives | |
| WP2, WP3 | WP6 | 2016-01-31 | Governance types about the Baltic Sea | Alternative governance types |
| WP2 | WP6 | Salmon and herring fishers' commitment to the fishing restrictions Fraction of a regulation actually implemented? | Applicability of planned management options in practice | |
| WP3 | WP6 | Management paths to the objectives about Baltic salmon and herring | Normative scenarios (paths that must be taken to reach an objective) | |
| WP3 | WP6 | Management of Baltic salmon and herring | Management options (decisions) | |
| WP3 | WP4 | Dioxin emissions into the Baltic Sea | Trends of dioxin deposition into the Baltic Sea | |
| WP3 | WP4 | Eutrophication: Cholorophyll A in the Baltic Sea (indicator of phosphorus and nitrogen in the water in different areas and times) --# : How is this actually used? --Jouni (talk) 11:26, 22 April 2015 (UTC) | Trends of eutrophication of the Baltic Sea | |
| WP3 | WP5 | 2017-10-31 | Baltic herring consumption in Finland Salmon and herring consumption around the Baltic Sea | Trends of fish consumption |
| WP4 | WP5 | 2017-10-31 | Salmon and herring populations in the Baltic Sea Salmon and herring catch in the Baltic Sea by time and area and fish size | Predicted salmon and herring stocks by time, area, and size |
| WP4 | WP3, WP5 | 2017-10-31 | EU-kalat This page is a study about Finnish measurements Dioxin concentrations in fish in the Baltic Sea this is a variable page based on e.g. EU-kalat data and Goherr project results. | Bioaccumulation of dioxins in fish and potential of fishing to change that |
| WP5 | WP6 | 2017-12-31 | Health benefits and risks of Baltic herring and salmon | Health benefits and risks of Baltic herring and salmon |
| WP5 | WP3, WP6 | 2017-04-30 | Reactions of people to fish eating recommendations | People's willingness to change consumption patterns based on risk |
| WP5 | WP6 | 2017-04-30 | Determinants of fish-eating habits around the Baltic Sea | Determinants of fish-eating habits |
--# : Add your suggestions about deadlines! --Jouni (talk) 15:32, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
- WP2 Socio-cultural values and governance
- WP3 Scenarios and management
- WP4 Fish stock
- WP5 Health impacts
- WP6 Decision support model
Analyses
Indices
Calculations
See also
Keywords
Terminology
- Normative scenarios
- paths you need to take to reach a defined goal
- Expolorative scenarios
- identify key uncertainties and dependencies to describe coherent paths into the future.
- Governance types
- How things are managed (e.g. top down command or co-management).
- Management action
- Actions to be taken based on decision-maker's decision (i.e. decisions)
References
Assmuth Timo and Jalonen Pauliina 2005: Risks and management of dioxin-like compounds in Baltic Sea fish: An integrated assessment. Nordic Council of Ministers, Copenhagen. 
Assmuth Jalonen Dioxin risk assessment 2005 [1]
