Talk:RM analysis Minna Ruokolainen

Exercise evaluation

Analysis vs. object of analysis

* ability to differentiate between the analysis (knowledge creating process of studying real-world phenomena) and the phenomena that the analysis looks into

←1: The focus of evaluation is on the analyses and the knowledge they intend to create. --Mikko Pohjola 11:50, 25 May 2011 (EEST)

Score: 2/2

Analysis-use relationship

* ability to consider the possible meaning/value of the knowledge intended to be created by the planned analysis in different uses by different users

←2: The different perspectives properly considered. --Mikko Pohjola 11:50, 25 May 2011 (EEST)

Score: 2/2

Usability of evaluation

* identification of major strengths as well as possible points of improvement
* critical and constructive remarks to help develop the analysis (plan) further

←3: Strengths and points of improvement in different analysis plans are pointed out in many places. The evaluation provides useful information for considerations on how to develop the plans further. --Mikko Pohjola 11:50, 25 May 2011 (EEST)

⇤4: Seems that there are a couple of misunderstanding of the plan contents leading some remarks astray. Not sure if this should be considered a fault of the plan description or a mistake in the evaluation. --Mikko Pohjola 11:50, 25 May 2011 (EEST)

Score: 3/4

Summarizing

* wrapping-up of the individual evaluations and tying them into the context described in the exercise description

←6: The comments tie into the given context. --Mikko Pohjola 11:50, 25 May 2011 (EEST)

⇤7: No overall statement(s) to wrap up the individual evaluations provided. --Mikko Pohjola 11:50, 25 May 2011 (EEST)

Score: 1/2

Bonus points

* e.g. value adding extra work done

Total Score: 8/10