Talk:RM analysis Sallamari Tynkkynen

Exercise evaluation

Analysis vs. object of analysis

* ability to differentiate between the analysis (knowledge creating process of studying real-world phenomena) and the phenomena that the analysis looks into

←1: Focus of evaluation is on the analyses and the knowledge they intend to create. --Mikko Pohjola 12:02, 25 May 2011 (EEST)

Score: 2/2

Analysis-use relationship

* ability to consider the possible meaning/value of the knowledge intended to be created by the planned analysis in different uses by different users

←2: The different perspectives properly considered. --Mikko Pohjola 12:02, 25 May 2011 (EEST)

Score: 2/2

Usability of evaluation

* identification of major strengths as well as possible points of improvement
* critical and constructive remarks to help develop the analysis (plan) further

←3: Main strengths and application potential identified. Some good remarks on potential limitations of different analysis approaches or the decision/action options they address. --Mikko Pohjola 12:02, 25 May 2011 (EEST)

⇤4: The points of improvement in different analyses could have been brought up a bit more bravely in order to better guide the further development of the analysis plans. --Mikko Pohjola 12:02, 25 May 2011 (EEST)

Score: 3/4

Summarizing

* wrapping-up of the individual evaluations and tying them into the context described in the exercise description

←5: Clear, concise overall statements and a summary that tie into the given context. --Mikko Pohjola 12:02, 25 May 2011 (EEST)

Score: 2/2

Bonus points

* e.g. value adding extra work done

←6: Quite good application of the evaluation attributes according to the "properties of good assessment" -framework presented in the lectures and in Opasnet. --Mikko Pohjola 12:02, 25 May 2011 (EEST)

Score: 1/2

Total Score: 10/10

This is still an interesting page :)