Talk:RM analysis oluyemitoyinbo

Exercise evaluation

Analysis vs. object of analysis

* ability to differentiate between the analysis (knowledge creating process of studying real-world phenomena) and the phenomena that the analysis looks into

←1: The focus of the evaluation is mostly on the analysis plans and the knowledge they intend to create. --Mikko Pohjola 12:17, 25 May 2011 (EEST)

⇤2: At times the evaluation however hovers between evaluating the analyses and evaluating or describing the decision/action options intended to be considered in the analyses. --Mikko Pohjola 12:17, 25 May 2011 (EEST)

Score: 1/2

Analysis-use relationship

* ability to consider the possible meaning/value of the knowledge intended to be created by the planned analysis in different uses by different users

←3: The varying meaning of different analyses for different uses/users is considered. --Mikko Pohjola 12:17, 25 May 2011 (EEST)

Score: 2/2

Usability of evaluation

* identification of major strengths as well as possible points of improvement
* critical and constructive remarks to help develop the analysis (plan) further

←4: The main ideas in the analyses, and some of their strengths and limitations are identified. --Mikko Pohjola 12:17, 25 May 2011 (EEST)

⇤5: As the evaluation in many parts remains on the level of describing either the idea behind the analyses or the decision/action options they look into, the evaluation does not provide the best possible guidance for those who intend to take the analysis plans further. --Mikko Pohjola 12:17, 25 May 2011 (EEST)

Score: 2/4

Summarizing

* wrapping-up of the individual evaluations and tying them into the context described in the exercise description

←1: An overall statement that somewhat ties into the given context is provided. --Mikko Pohjola 12:17, 25 May 2011 (EEST)

Score: 1/2

Bonus points

* e.g. value adding extra work done

Total Score: 6/10