Search results

Jump to: navigation, search
  • ...n the near future (fall 2006), and both have raised controversial opinions and public interest. * Protection of human health and the environment
    28 KB (4,037 words) - 11:12, 20 August 2014
  • * [[New thoughts and discussions]] * [http://www.sciencemag.org/content/335/6075/1428.full Gut microbes and immunity]
    28 KB (3,869 words) - 07:58, 14 August 2012
  • ...provision of uncertainty margins, and identification of sensitive pathways and risks. The project will develop methodologies, databases, models, and software on the following topics:
    2 KB (230 words) - 12:27, 25 June 2009
  • ...ly registration is highly recommended in order to help both the organizers and the participants to arrange the facilities, programs etc. ...e a real-life risk assessment case using the software tools that have been and are being developed for the purpose.
    21 KB (3,069 words) - 12:45, 28 March 2011
  • ...ook_TOC Guidebook] [[:Intarese:Help:Guidebook on risk assessment| (old)]] (and Resource Centre) is ::[[Purpose and properties of good assessments]] WP 1.1
    19 KB (2,420 words) - 11:41, 24 October 2008
  • ...g the causal relations in moe detail. It may also contain quality criteria and plans for collecting the necessary data or models needed to estimate the va ..., synthesis of the information into the form of the information structure, and discussions about the descriptions of variables. The work of this phase is
    7 KB (1,157 words) - 08:57, 2 December 2008
  • In this phase the information created in the assessment is compiled and conveyed to the intended users. *Evaluation
    1 KB (129 words) - 13:16, 3 August 2008
  • ...buting to a discussion| guidance to deal with disputes]], find resolutions and document the choices made so that they can be defended afterwards. Argument ...ambridge University Press.</ref>) is used as the primary means to describe and resolve any disputes about scientific or valuation issues within the assess
    8 KB (1,192 words) - 07:21, 30 January 2011
  • ...nto two parts: a shorter list of "official" terms used in open assessment; and a longer list of terms that each have a dedicated page. These list overlap. ; assess (arvioida): to estimate a real or hypothetical situation and combine that to value judgements by stakeholders; to make an assessment.
    7 KB (1,026 words) - 07:50, 23 March 2015
  • ...factors that constitute the performance, the ''goodness'', of assessments and they can be evaluated within a single general framework. ...pages already existing about the same topic. The old content was archived and can be found [http://en.opasnet.org/en-opwiki/index.php?title=Evaluating_as
    9 KB (1,312 words) - 12:02, 26 March 2009
  • '''Assessments and participation ...good governance, but also enlightenment and awareness among plural groups and members of the society at large.
    38 KB (5,608 words) - 18:17, 8 April 2011
  • [[Category:Decision analysis and risk management]] ...to, J.T. Perspectives to Performance of Environment and Health Assessments and Models—From Outputs to Outcomes? Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2013
    63 KB (8,880 words) - 16:20, 4 March 2015
  • ...a freely structured object, see a definition below. {{disclink|Structured and unstructured models}} ...el of stressors, dose-response-relationships. <ref>[[:en:Model|Wikipedia]] and old working definition of SP 4.</ref><section end=glossary />
    8 KB (1,262 words) - 12:55, 17 November 2009
  • ...d to be called in early phases of its development. See [[open assessment]] and [[Opasnet]]. ...and discussions on the topic are found under the terms ''open assessment'' and ''Opasnet'''''.
    65 KB (9,370 words) - 11:37, 20 November 2009
  • [[Category:Decision analysis and risk management]] ...2) the actual discussion, organised as hierarchical threads of arguments; and 3) the resolution of discussion. Once a discussion reaches a resolution, th
    8 KB (1,184 words) - 14:46, 9 April 2015
  • ...d out, how much you actually know about [[open assessment]] or [[open risk management]]. ...d send them via email to jouni.tuomisto(at)thl.fi. You will get your score and right answers as reply.
    3 KB (473 words) - 08:20, 2 February 2012
  • ...peer review also often ends up addressing also questions of e.g. usability and relevance, in a relatively random fashion. Despite its shortcomings, peer r ...n then be e.g. 1) not reviewed, 2) reviewed, but not accepted, 3) reviewed and accepted. The amount of required acceptance statements can be agreed accord
    8 KB (1,222 words) - 09:17, 14 June 2014
  • ...role to actively remove hindrances preventing the use of open assessment, and also to study these hindrances. ...uctures and practices that can guide individuals and groups to more easily and effectively participate in [[open assessment]]s?
    15 KB (2,257 words) - 06:35, 13 April 2011
  • ...ply the answer in practical assessments: '''how can scientific information and value judgements be organised for improving societal decision-making in a s ...management arena. It is based, however, on a clear information structure and scientific methodolgy in order to provide clear rules for [[dealing with di
    36 KB (5,339 words) - 09:03, 15 September 2015
  • ...oup on Climate Change''' is an activity group of researchers, politicians, and stakeholders based on voluntary work. The Task Group aims to develop an agr * The Task Group aims to promote any solutions and actions that are scientifically defendable. If science does not rule out on
    6 KB (975 words) - 06:27, 21 December 2009

View (previous 20 | next 20) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)