Difference between revisions of "Template:Peer review"

From Testiwiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(first draft based on Template:Self-evaluation)
 
(links to merged templates)
 
(8 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
−
{| align="right" width="250pt" {{prettytable}}
+
[[Category:Peer reviewed]]
−
!Peer review
+
{| width="400pt" border="2" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="3" rules="all" style="margin:0em 1em 1em 1em; border:solid 1px #AAAAAA; border-collapse:collapse;background-color:#F9F9F9; font-size:100%; empty-cells:show;"
−
|-----
+
|+'''Peer review
−
|{{highlight|This page has been peer reviewed by an independent expert of the field.<br>The grade is {{#if:{{{1|}}}|'''{{{1}}}'''|'''Not graded'''}}.}}
+
|{{highlight|{{#if:{{{version|}}}|A [{{{version|}}} version of this page]|This page}} has been peer reviewed.<br>The page belongs to class {{#if:{{{class|}}}|'''{{{class}}}'''|'''Not defined'''}}. <br>The amount of respect is {{#if:{{{respect|}}}|'''{{{respect}}}''' [[onor]]s|'''not defined'''}}.}}
−
{{#if:{{{2|}}}|<br>Reviewer: {{{2}}}|}}
+
 
 +
{{#if:{{{evaluation|}}}|'''Evaluation:'''<br>
 +
{{{evaluation|}}}|}}
 +
 
 +
Reviewers: {{#if:{{{reviewers|}}}|{{{reviewers}}}|Anonymous}}
 
|-----
 
|-----
−
|The basis for the review is the quality of work performed. Possible grades:
+
|The basis for the review is the [[Evaluating assessment performance|quality and applicability]] of content for a potential reader. The target population may be different for different classes. See [[:Category:Quality of an object|possible classes and typical respects]].
−
* '''Unacceptable''': The page does not comply with minimum standards of scientific work.
 
−
* '''Acceptable''': The page has utilised acceptable scientific methods in a proper way, and sufficient scientific critique has been applied.
 
−
* '''State-of-the-art''': The page has been developed using state-of-the-art scientific methods and information.
 
−
* '''Outstanding''': The page has been developed using highly innovative methods and/or data.
 
 
|}
 
|}
  
−
<noinclude>[[Category:Quality control]]</noinclude>
+
<noinclude>[[Category:Quality control]]
 +
This template is used on the talk page to show a brief evaluation of the peer review. There is no template for the full peer review. Instead, use the normal templates for discussion, located under the subtitle '''Peer review'''.
 +
 
 +
The parameters:
 +
* reviewers: user name(s) of the reviewer(s) (as <nowiki>[[User:Name|]]</nowiki> links)
 +
* class: To which [[:Category:Quality of an object|page class]] this page belongs.
 +
* respect: How many [[onor]]s is given by the reviewers to one event of reading the page. See [[:Category:Quality of an object|typical number of onors for different page types]].
 +
* evaluation: A brief summary of the main points of the review.
 +
* version: a permanent link to the page version that was reviewed.
 +
 
 +
Note:
 +
* A previous way to link to the reviewed version: <nowiki>[{{fullurl:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|oldid={{{oldid}}}}}]</nowiki>
 +
* The following templates were merged to [[:Template:Peer review]]: [http://en.opasnet.org/en-opwiki/index.php?title=Template:Review&oldid=10812 Template:Review] | [http://en.opasnet.org/en-opwiki/index.php?title=Template:Quality_assessment&oldid=5137 Template:Quality assessment] | [http://en.opasnet.org/en-opwiki/index.php?title=Template:Self-evaluation&oldid=6370 Template:Self-evaluation] | [http://en.opasnet.org/en-opwiki/index.php?title=Template:Quality_assessment_box&oldid=11626 Template:Quality assessment box]
 +
 
 +
 
 +
The following text can be copied to the place where you want the review box to show up (typically to the Talk page under a subheading "Peer review"):
 +
 
 +
<nowiki>
 +
{{Peer review
 +
|reviewers  = ~~~~
 +
|class      = See possible classes from </nowiki>[[:Category:Quality of an object]]<nowiki>
 +
|respect    = Replace this text with the amount of [[onor]]s you want to give to the page.
 +
|evaluation = Replace this text with the list of topics and their evaluations (;Topic: Evaluation).
 +
|version    = Replace this text with the permanent link of the reviewed version.
 +
}}
 +
</nowiki></noinclude>

Latest revision as of 19:19, 20 March 2010

Peer review
This page has been peer reviewed.
The page belongs to class Not defined.
The amount of respect is not defined.


Reviewers: Anonymous

The basis for the review is the quality and applicability of content for a potential reader. The target population may be different for different classes. See possible classes and typical respects.

This template is used on the talk page to show a brief evaluation of the peer review. There is no template for the full peer review. Instead, use the normal templates for discussion, located under the subtitle Peer review.

The parameters:

  • reviewers: user name(s) of the reviewer(s) (as [[User:Name|]] links)
  • class: To which page class this page belongs.
  • respect: How many onors is given by the reviewers to one event of reading the page. See typical number of onors for different page types.
  • evaluation: A brief summary of the main points of the review.
  • version: a permanent link to the page version that was reviewed.

Note:


The following text can be copied to the place where you want the review box to show up (typically to the Talk page under a subheading "Peer review"): 

{{Peer review
|reviewers  = ~~~~
|class      = See possible classes from Category:Quality of an object
|respect    = Replace this text with the amount of [[onor]]s you want to give to the page.
|evaluation = Replace this text with the list of topics and their evaluations (;Topic: Evaluation).
|version    = Replace this text with the permanent link of the reviewed version.
}}
Retrieved from "http://www.opasnet.org/testiwiki/index.php?title=Template:Peer_review&oldid=14985"