Difference between revisions of "Talk:Assessment of the health impacts of H1N1 vaccination/Group A"
(→Pandemrix should not be used because of narcolepsy risk: argumentation commented) |
m (→Pandemrix should not be used because of narcolepsy risk) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[Category:DARM exercise]] | [[Category:DARM exercise]] | ||
== Pandemrix should not be used because of narcolepsy risk == | == Pandemrix should not be used because of narcolepsy risk == | ||
+ | |||
+ | Jacob, Enembe | ||
{{discussion | {{discussion |
Revision as of 05:35, 2 April 2011
Pandemrix should not be used because of narcolepsy risk
Jacob, Enembe
Statements: Pandemrix should not be used any more anywhere because its narcolepsy risk is too high. NOTE! The time of the statement is September 2010.
Resolution: Resolution not yet found. (A stable resolution, when found, should be updated to the main page.) |
Argumentation:
⇤J1 : Despite risks, Pandemrix is an effective vaccine and has clearly net positive effects in countries where emergency treatment is poorly available for severe swine flu cases. --Jouni 23:05, 31 March 2011 (EEST) ⇤A1 : According to EMA, data received so far is still insufficient to establish a causal relationship between Pandemrix and narcolepsy. One possible explanation for the results is that Pandemrix could interact with unknown local environmental and/or genetic factor in contributing to the increased risk of narcolepsy among the vaccinated population aged 4 to 19 years in Finland --Jacob Attipoe 11:18, 1 April 2011 (EEST) ⇤A2 : The overall annual incidence of narcolepsy remained consistent with prevaccination scenarios. --Jacob Attipoe 11:22, 1 April 2011 (EEST) ←A3a : Even though a nine fold increase in narcolepsy was found in vaccinated population, the occurrence of narcolepsy was still very rare with this apparent increase. --Jacob Attipoe 11:18, 1 April 2011 (EEST)
←A3b : A number of different reasons may account for the observed rise in the incidence of narcolepsy namely: (H1N1) infection, vaccination, combined effect of infection and vaccination, or some other factor entirely. Infections have been documented as causing narcolepsy. --Jacob Attipoe 11:18, 1 April 2011 (EEST)
←A5 : As there is presently no swine flu epidemic in Finland, there is no immediate need for swine flu vaccination --Jacob Attipoe 11:18, 1 April 2011 (EEST) ←J2 : The reputation of Pandemrix is globally so poor that it is impossible to use it any more. --Jouni 23:05, 31 March 2011 (EEST) |
--# : Add links to pages from where you found your arguments. --Jouni 07:05, 2 April 2011 (EEST)
--# : You could rethink the relations between arguments A1, A2, A3b, and A4. Can you e.g. develop a new, clear, and strong argument that is defended by all of them? --Jouni 07:05, 2 April 2011 (EEST)