Difference between revisions of "User:Adedayo"

Revision as of 19:49, 26 January 2013

Homework 1

1. What is the main purpose of environmental health assessment?

The main aim of environmental health assessment is to provide science based information in the process of decision making.

1. What is impact assessment?

Impact assessment is the assessment of various public and private projects on the environment. It is a framework that serves for the consideration of environmental issues in decisions and activities of wide societal relevance.

Homework 3: Draft of an assessment

Due date: 21 jan

• Task: With your pair, draft an assessment about the topic agreed on during the lecture. Write the draft assessment on either your or your partner's user page (and put a link to it on the other's user page). Copy the headings and explanations below to the page and use them as template. Choose your specific topic among these areas: a) Talvivaara mine or b) metal mining in general or c) climate change policies in cities.

Scope

Defines the purpose of the assessment: why is it done?

To evaluate the climate change impact of incineration as the main waste management plan within the Lagos metropolis.

Question

A research question that the assessment attempts to answer.

Is there a better waste management plan other than incineration in Lagos?

Intended use and users

List of users that are supposed to need the assessment. Also, how do we expect them to use the information?

The state government – the government will use the information in policy formulation. Waste management companies – incorporate results into structuring waste management options and methods. General public – get information on climate change and waste disposal effects on the phenomenon

Participants

Who is needed to participate to make the assessment a well-balanced and well-informed work? Also, if specific reasons exists: who is not allowed to participate and why?

Environmentalists State Government Engineers Community

Scenarios

Decisions and decision options considered. Also, if scenarios (defined here as delibarate deviations from the truth) are used, they are described here. For example this is a scenario: "Let's assume that the whole population is exposed as much as the maximally exposed individual, because we want to see if even the worst-case scenario causes concern."

- BAU- Continue to use incineration as the main waste main management plan - Other waste management methods that could be adopted – Landfills, Waste separation (Composting of bio-wastes)

Analyses

What statistical or other analyses are needed to be able to produce results that are useful for making conclusions about the question?

Compare costs, environmental, social and health effects of the different waste management plans.

Answer

Results

What are the results of the analysis?

Health Effects – Amount of Heavy metals, Respiratory tract infections, Pathogens, Socio-economic Effects – Cost Analysis, Job creation Environmental Effects – Amount and types of GHG emissions.

Conclusion

What is the conclusion about the question based on the results obtained?

Rationale

Endpoints

Community – The community will be interested in the health impacts and lowest possible costs for waste disposal, while their focus might not necessarily be on climate change, environmental aesthetics will be of concern to them. Waste Management Companies – Scenario that guarantees highest profit. State Government – Most environmentally viable management option.

Variables

• Health effects of the different methods – Respiratory tract infections, Heavy metals. • Emissions – Methane, CO2 • Economics – Costs.

Homework 4: Climate policy decisions and actions

What are the aims/goals of the strategy/program, i.e. what are the desired impacts and outcomes striven for?

o Landmark projects, optimization of energy, Independent and decentralized energy supply, energy savings in transport, In general, the aim is to start today using the available capital and manpower to reduce the current energy demand and increase the range of renewable energy in the future. It is about investing in a climate compatible future. o To make the city of Rotterdam climate change resilient by 2025. The big picture involves confronting climate change issues as an opportunity rather than a threat; hence the cities building and structure will be geared towards one that compliments the climate of the future. o These goals also include 50% reduction of harmful CO2 emissions by the year 2025.

Who are those that benefit if the aims/goals of the strategy/program are reached?

o The beneficiaries are the residence of the city who live and work, businesses and corporations established in the city.

What are the actions that are needed/intended to take in order to progress towards the aims/goals?

o Sustainable protection against flooding in the city o International collaborations which opens Rotterdam to 50% co-finance from other part of the world to meet the adaptation paradigm of the strategy o Setting up of international knowledge development network called connecting delta cities o Implementation of the adaptive strategies and a focus to meet changing circumstances o Improving knowledge on water and delta technologies through proactive research knowledge by collaborating with Rotterdam University (water management), Delft University for theoretical knowledge and Erasmus University Rotterdam o Development of new educational programs incorporated into University curricula that are pro-climate resilience, which gives the younger generation especially the student a sense of belonging in participating in the project. o Position the city as a world leader in the climate change innovation and marketing its expertise to the world especially to other coastal and delta cities. This involves expos, international conferences among others.

Who are those that actually realize these actions?

o The climate change adaptation committee from the climate office of the city of Rotterdam, and environmental experts.

What are the decisions that are needed to make in order to enable/promote the actions?

This involves implementation of climate change strategy and proactive marketing of the strategies to other cities and countries especially Delta and coastal cities, strategies made are directed towards: o Flood management o Accessibility o Adaptive building o urban water system o the urban climate

Who are the decision makers?

o The city council and government of Rotterdam

What direct or indirect health impacts, positive or negative, these decisions and actions (may) have?

o The health impact includes reduction in the outbreak of respiratory infections and diseases. o A general improved general health condition as a result of a cleaner and more conducive environment o Safe and attractive environment which will promote recreational activities and relaxation o It reduces water related hazards and death o Reduction in heat stress in the urban city

Where and how do these impacts take place, who are those that face these health impacts in practice?

o Reduction in heat stress will be as a result of the 50% reduction in CO2 emissions this will also have an effect on respiratory infections. o Sustainable, safe and attractive environment will enhance living condition and promote good health of the whole citizens

Are the health impacts big or small in relation to other impacts (e.g. economical, social, climate, other environmental,)

o The health impact is quite minimal since the effects of the strategy are largely indirect on health compared to other economic, social, climatic and environmental impacts

Do the intended policies result in win-win, win-lose, lose-win, or lose-lose situations with regard to health and other impacts?

The policies are largely geared in the direction of a win-win situation.

Formulate a plausible and meaningful specific assessment question that takes account of (some of) the aspects considered in above questions

What are the health impacts of energy related CO2. Will the Rotterdam climate strategy have an health impact on the population of the city?