Talk:Hämeenkyrö MSWI risk assessment: Indicators
- Decisions related to Hämeenkyrö case
- Possible indicators (optimising variables) in Hämeenkyrö
Contents
Well-being of the population (smells, comfort, noise)
Kari Auri
Discussion on well-being indicators
Statements:
Resolution: Resolution not yet found. (A stable resolution, when found, should be updated to the main page.) |
Argumentation:
|
Effects on economy (esp. gas energy plant)
Juha
Discussion on effect on economy
Statements:
Resolution: Resolution not yet found. (A stable resolution, when found, should be updated to the main page.) |
Argumentation:
Probably it could be possible to use also ash produced by MSWI? In Elimäki new factory was started where they produce forest fertilizer from the ash, which means that ash is not waste any longer but can be used (in case it is clear enough to be spread on the ground). -Sanna |
Transportation costs of waste
Anne
Discussion on ...
Statements:
Resolution: Resolution not yet found. (A stable resolution, when found, should be updated to the main page.) |
Argumentation:
The web pages of SYKE and local Environmental authorities' lists do not have a plan of MSWI in Tampere. |
Health effects of dioxins and PM2.5
Anu T
Discussion on short term effects of dioxins
Statements:
Resolution: Resolution not yet found. (A stable resolution, when found, should be updated to the main page.) |
Argumentation:
←Short term effects of dioxins only occur when the acute doses exceed the current background exposures by several orders of magnitude. This kind of exposures are not possible in the case of MSWI, and they can be excluded.: --Jouni 10:33, 21 September 2006 (EEST), Anu {{{3}}} |