Domestic fish consumption of the pregnant women in Finland

From Testiwiki
Revision as of 10:45, 15 October 2008 by Patrycja Gradowska (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search

<accesscontrol>beneris</accesscontrol>

Scope

Domestic fish consumption of the pregnant women in Finland describes the fish consumption of the pregnant women in Finland. Exposure due to Finnish fish consumption only. Imported fish are not considered. D↷ D↷

Definition

Causality

List of parents:

  • None

Data

Data 1

Fish consumption by pregnant women [1] for twelve various fish species commonly consumed in Finland as normal distributions (mean, SD).

Data 2

Domestic fish consumption of the pregnant women include fish consumption data [2] for twelve different species and demonstrate five fractiles (0.05, 0.25, 0.5, 0.75 and 0.95). There are several species with zero consumption. These values are replaced with a very low value 1u=10-6 to avoid errors prompts in the further calculations of the model. In addition we use the estimated fish consumption of the general population [3], as a reference. D↷

Data 3

Consumption of sea and freshwater fish species by pregnant women was extracted from [4] where the summary statistics of intakes of twelve fish species by users only are given (mean, sd and percentiles: 5th,25th, 50th, 75th, 95th). The estimation process was basically broken down into three steps. In the first step fish intake distributions for fish users were determined based on data in [5]. Here, for a given species the starting/initial cumulative distribution function (CDF) of intake was first constructed by linear interpolation between known percentiles. In general, this distribution will not reproduce the mean and SD as provided by the data. Therefore, the constrained optimization was further used to find the CDF that satisfies the percentiles given and whose mean and variance are as close as possible to the mean and variance from the data. In the second step the intake distributions for all pregnant women were determined. This was possible thanks to information about the percentage of pregnant women consuming particular fish species. Finally, species specific data on the sea and inland intake proportions (extracted from [6]) was used to estimate the intake of sea and freshwater fish species by all pregnant women.


Unit

Data 1

g/d of fish users

Data 2

kg/a

Data 3

g/d

Formula

Data 1

<anacode>3.539 4.046 0.0988 0.1122 0.9498 1.512 5.589 5.162 1.526 3.585 8.691 9.747 2.31 1.904 0.5699 1.161 7.822 6.761 1.636 1.713 0.000e+000 0.000e+000 6.192 7.883 </anacode>

Data 2

Analytica_id:

<anacode>Table(Quantile,Fish)( 3.538520795,0.0987977390000001,0.949758417,5.588543108,1.526348165,8.690571699,2.309576484,0.569864064,7.822047198,1.6355467,0,6.192115439, 4.046127233,0.112185126,1.512467425,5.161569621,3.585166761,9.746680784,1.904184514,1.161265955,6.76128292,1.712611279,0,7.882813666, 0.486401325,0.039995998,0.044445555,3.199680074,0.044445555,0.543945572,1.319868031,0.044445555,2.924507455,0.213311992,0,2.474752424, 0.606605988,0.039995998,0.044445555,3.199680074,0.044445555,2.055794298,1.319868031,0.044445555,2.924507455,0.426623983,0,2.474752424, 1.945751342,0.039995998,0.190503825,3.199680074,0.0888911100000001,6.076351881,1.319868031,0.0888911100000001,5.849014909,1.133886573,0,4.949504848, 4.944405412,0.099995997,1.155451108,6.399360148,1.850337694,11.27679141,2.639736061,1.138019529,10.66421104,2.267773146,0,7.425000072, 10.52461027,0.342851994,3.601659561,13.7145601,7.420697623,23.43747716,5.657256199,2.276039057,18.40303739,5.073409465,0,21.21396707 )</anacode>

Result

Data 1

Fish species Consumption
Baltic herring (Clupea harengus membras) 3.539
Herring (Clupea harengus) 0.0988
Vendace (Coregonus albula) 0.9498
Whitefish (Coregonus lavaretus) 5.589
Pike (Esox lucius) 1.526
Rainbow trout (Onchorhynchus mykiss) 8.691
Shrimp (Pandalus sp.) 2.31
Perch (Perca fluviatilis) 0.5699
Saithe (Pollachius virens) 7.822
Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) 1.636
Pike-perch (Sander lucioperca) 0
Tuna (Thunnus thynnus) 6.192


Data 2

Fish species High consumption Median consumption Low consumption
Farmed salmon (sea+inland) 5.084 1.318 0.118
Wild salmon 0.301 0.07803 6.986e-003
Herring(sea) 0.1251 0.0146 0.0146
White fish(sea) 1.935 0.4515 0.4515
Sprat(sea) 1.000e-006 1.000e-006 1.000e-006
Perch(sea) 0.2179 8.509e-003 4.255e-003
Flounder(sea) 1.000e-006 1.000e-006 1.000e-006
Pike-perch(sea) 1.000e-006 1.000e-006 1.000e-006
Bream(sea) 1.000e-006 1.000e-006 1.000e-006
Pike(sea) 0.5029 6.024e-003 3.012e-003
Vendace(sea) 0.05032 2.662e-003 6.210e-004
Burbot(sea) 1.000e-006 1.000e-006 1.000e-006
Wild salmon(inland) 0.6033 0.1564 0.014
White fish(inland) 3.071 0.7164 0.7164
Perch(inland) 0.6129 0.02394 0.01197
Pike-perch(inland) 1.000e-006 1.000e-006 1.000e-006
Bream(inland) 1.000e-006 1.000e-006 1.000e-006
Pike(inland) 2.206 0.02642 0.01321
Vendace(inland) 1.264 0.06687 0.0156
Burbot(inland) 1.000e-006 1.000e-006 1.000e-006


Data 3

Fish Species
Mean consumption
BS Herring
2.0649
Vendace(inland)
0.51394
Vendace(sea)
0.02141
Whitefish(inland)
0.83959
Whitefish(sea)
0.53679
Pike(inland)
0.79769
Pike(sea)
0.18711
Perch(inland)
0.27008
Perch(sea)
0.09489
Atlantic Salmon
1.1129
Pike-perch(inland)
0
Pike-Perch(sea)
0


References

  1. Tero Hirvonen. 2007. Beneris_Food consumption pregnant women_FINLAND_300507_th.xls
  2. Methyl mercury: BENERIS WP2 Database
  3. Methyl mercury:Leino et al. 2007 submitted
  4. Tero Hirvonen. 2007. Beneris_Food consumption pregnant women_FINLAND_300507_th.xls
  5. Tero Hirvonen. 2007. Beneris_Food consumption pregnant women_FINLAND_300507_th.xls
  6. RKTL,2006. Finnish Fisheries Statistics.