Difference between revisions of "Benefit-risk assessment of fish and related policy options"

From Testiwiki
Jump to: navigation, search
m (→‎Policy options implications for fish consumption)
m (→‎Policy options implications for fish consumption)
Line 54: Line 54:
 
*Dietary habits
 
*Dietary habits
 
A decision of an individual. How personal preferencies influence fish consumption
 
A decision of an individual. How personal preferencies influence fish consumption
−
 
+
*Quality of fish as food
 +
The better the quality, the more fish is used for food.
 +
*Fish marketability
  
 
[[Image:BRAgraph01.jpg|Simple graph for policies]]
 
[[Image:BRAgraph01.jpg|Simple graph for policies]]

Revision as of 12:16, 14 May 2007

These pages were created to enable comprehensive understanding on bio-socio-economic issues related to fish consumption by humans with a strong emphasis laid on human health implications. We focus on gathering information on policies of fisheries management and human health consequences attributable to fish consumption to finally reach a state of comprehension where an integrated benefit-risk assessment of fish consumption can be done by taking account all the relevant societal and economical motivations yet not leaving aside any ecological implications that are concluded as being relevant.

D↷

We invite anyone concerned with the above mentioned issues to contribute to the development of these pages by participating to discussions in the discussion page (discussion tab is located next to article tab at the top of this page). These pages are maintained by (firstname.surname@ktl.fi):

  • Karjalainen, Anna (Ph.D., ecotoxicologist)
  • Leino, Olli (M.Sc. Techn)
  • Tuomisto, Jouni (MD, epidemiologist and responsible researcher)
  • Turunen, Anu (M.Sc.)
  • Verkasalo, Pia (MD, Ph.D., docent of epidemiology)


Xenobiotic impacts on fish and its socio-economic relevance

The simplistic conceptual graph below describes some sublethal xenobiotic impacts on fish and their socio-economic relevance and human health implications. The most important nodes in the causal chain are filled in with a dark blue colour. These are the factors that we 1) call variables and 2) find most relevant, at the moment, from the human health point of view, and therefore aim to describe in our actual model (see graph under title "Policy options implications for fish consumption" below).

D↷


Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination

Literature on the topic

  • Elliott M, Hemingway KL, Krueger D, Thiel R, Hylland K, Arukwe A, Förlin L, Sayer M. 2003. From the Individual to the Population and Community responses to Pollution. In: Effects of Pollution on Fish, Molecular Effects and Population Responses. Lawrence AJ, Hemingway KL. (eds.), Blackwell Science Ltd., Oxford, UK.
  • Lawrence AJ, Elliott M. 2002. Introduction and Conceptual Model. In: Effects of Pollution on Fish, Molecular Effects and Population Responses. Lawrence AJ, Hemingway KL. (eds.), Blackwell Science Ltd., Oxford, UK.

Policy options implications for fish consumption

Relevant policy options for controlling human health effects due to fish consumption (under construction...).

  • Fisheries management. Underlying fisheries management policy of EU here
    • Directing and steering fishing
    • Regional restrictions and limitations
    • Financial support to aquaculture
    • Imposing duty on dumping of fish
  • Consumption advisories and recommendations
  • Steering institutional kitchen

How the fish use of institutional kitchen can be influenced by policies? - e.g. use of herring has been declining in Finland, maybe due to high dioxin concentrations of herring

  • Fish marketability. Some background on the quality chain management in fish processing industry here
  • Implications to fishery

Policies to affect the fishery catch.

  • Dietary habits

A decision of an individual. How personal preferencies influence fish consumption

  • Quality of fish as food

The better the quality, the more fish is used for food.

  • Fish marketability
Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination

Health consequences attributable to fish consumption

Here we try to pinpoint the most relevant health endpoints for substances found in fish – both beneficial such as those ensuing from omega-3-fatty acid and vitamin D intake, and harmful, resulting from fish contamination by e.g. dioxins and (methyl)mercury (human xenobiotic exposure via intake of contaminated fish). This part is under construction.

End points

Here are listed some potential end points for substances to take into account in the model. There needs to exist: 1) scientific consensus about the effect 2) a dose-response relationship

  • Dioxin

-- cancer mortality

-- developmental disorders (teeth)

--

--

  • Methylmercury (MeHg)

-- Cardiovascular mortality

-- Neurobehavioral disorders

--

--

  • Omega-3 fatty acids (EPA+DHA)

-- reduction of CHD mortality + ischemic stroke

-- improved neurological development of children

-- improved eye vision (dose-response and benefits not easily definable?)

-- reduction of cancer (not plausible?)


  • vitamin-D

--

--

Materials and references

Projects, models, publications etc. related to the topic.

Retrieved from "http://www.opasnet.org/testiwiki/index.php?title=Benefit-risk_assessment_of_fish_and_related_policy_options&oldid=2600"