Difference between revisions of "Evaluating performance of environmental health assessments"
From Testiwiki
m (→Background) |
m |
||
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
== Background == | == Background == | ||
− | * | + | *General assessment framework |
− | * | + | *Societal context of assessments |
+ | *General purpose of assessments | ||
**to describe reality | **to describe reality | ||
**fulfill specific need | **fulfill specific need | ||
− | * | + | *How can environmental health assessments be evaluated? |
== Methods == | == Methods == | ||
Line 25: | Line 26: | ||
== Results == | == Results == | ||
− | * | + | *Properties of good assessments |
**quality of content | **quality of content | ||
**applicability | **applicability | ||
**efficiency | **efficiency | ||
− | * | + | *Evaluation process |
**a priori and/or a posteriori view | **a priori and/or a posteriori view | ||
**identification of purpose | **identification of purpose |
Revision as of 09:05, 13 March 2008
<accesscontrol>Members of projects,,Workshop2008,,beneris,,Erac,,Heimtsa,,Hiwate,,Intarese</accesscontrol>
This is a manuscript about evaluating performance of environmental health assessments. It emphasizes the importance of proper identification and explication of assessment purpose against which (and only which) the performance of the assessment can be evaluated. It also suggests a set of general properties of good assessments that can be used as the performance criteria of any kind of assessments.
Contents
Abstract
Background
Methods
Results
Conclusions
Background
- General assessment framework
- Societal context of assessments
- General purpose of assessments
- to describe reality
- fulfill specific need
- How can environmental health assessments be evaluated?
Methods
Results
- Properties of good assessments
- quality of content
- applicability
- efficiency
- Evaluation process
- a priori and/or a posteriori view
- identification of purpose
- evaluation of quality of content (uncertainty + relevance)
- in principle reality, but in practice golden standard as reference point
- evaluation of applicability
- evaluation of efficiency (effort expenditure)
- overall performance
- potential for effectiveness/effort given purpose
- can be further evaluated retrospectively against realized effectiveness (possibly against redefined purpose)
- potential for effectiveness/effort given purpose