Difference between revisions of "Kuopio workshop report"

From Testiwiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(two levels of variables)
(→‎Specification of desired features)
Line 2: Line 2:
  
  
−
== Specification of desired features ==
+
== Testing of Intarese methods and tools in noise policy case ==
−
This is a listing of desired features/functionality/documentation that is missing or need to be improved. It should be filled in and added to these lists as they are discovered
 
  
−
These and related issues are currently also being worked on at [[Tools needed in Intarese toolbox | Tools needed in Intarese toolbox]] page
 
  
  
−
=== Scoping of assessment ===
 
−
* Link to document with general guide on how to do scoping
 
−
* Graphical tool to assist in creation of framework
 
−
** Example framework diagram (different examples based on type of assessment chosen?)
 
−
** Blank "sheet" and functionality to add nodes(variables) and links between them
 
−
** Searchable database of node(variable) templates
 
−
*** Template contains predefined information about the node and how to work with it
 
−
*** Link to INTARESE method documentation relevant for this node(variable)
 
−
*** Functionality for listing previously done assessments who has used this template (and possibility to see how they used it in their specific assessment)
 
−
** Automatic creation of workspace(eg. wikipage) for each node
 
−
** Clickable framework diagram whitch takes you to the workspace of the node you select
 
−
** Possibility to compute all linked variables??
 
  
−
===Structure of the contents===
+
Image:Figure noise policy case
−
*There should be variables of two kinds:  
+
 
−
**Those that are coherent with the whole universe of high-level variables
+
 
−
**Those that are coherent within one risk assessment but probably incoherent with variables in other assessments.
+
 
 +
The noise policy case in the Schiphol assessment (see figure) tests and applies the Intarese methods and tools [[Tools needed in Intarese toolbox|(see table)]]. We start with the green and yellow variables, since there are data available.
 +
 
 +
===Noise levels: Application in noise policy case===
 +
 
 +
Original variable: [[Noise levels|Noise levels]]
 +
 
 +
'''Methods and tools needed'''
 +
 
 +
''Development of noise level indicator''
 +
 
 +
Methods and tools available:
 +
*WHO indicator development methodology
 +
**Application in case:
 +
**Input to method:
 +
**Output of method: Noise level indicator
 +
 
 +
''Meta-analysis of noise level data in Schiphol surrounding area''
 +
 
 +
Methods and tools available:
 +
*WP1.3 meta analysis guidance
 +
**Application in case:
 +
**Input to method:
 +
**Output of method:

Revision as of 11:28, 16 March 2007

The report about the workshop, including outcomes, experiences, lessons learned, problems faced, development needs identified etc., will be written here. An intermediate report will be prepared for presentation at the SP1 meeting on 20 March and the final report will be prepared in the end of the workshop and presented at SP4 workshop in April.


Testing of Intarese methods and tools in noise policy case

Image:Figure noise policy case


The noise policy case in the Schiphol assessment (see figure) tests and applies the Intarese methods and tools (see table). We start with the green and yellow variables, since there are data available.

Noise levels: Application in noise policy case

Original variable: Noise levels

Methods and tools needed

Development of noise level indicator

Methods and tools available:

  • WHO indicator development methodology
    • Application in case:
    • Input to method:
    • Output of method: Noise level indicator

Meta-analysis of noise level data in Schiphol surrounding area

Methods and tools available:

  • WP1.3 meta analysis guidance
    • Application in case:
    • Input to method:
    • Output of method:
Retrieved from "http://www.opasnet.org/testiwiki/index.php?title=Kuopio_workshop_report&oldid=12813"