Difference between revisions of "Pragma-dialectics"
From Testiwiki
(→Related literature) |
(→Related literature) |
||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
* Lippi, Marco; Torroni, Paolo. Argumentation Mining: State of the Art and Emerging Trends. ACM TRANSACTIONS ON INTERNET TECHNOLOGY. 16: 2 (Article Number: 10). {{doi|10.1145/2850417}} Published: APR 2016 [https://www.researchgate.net/publication/299548392_Argumentation_Mining] | * Lippi, Marco; Torroni, Paolo. Argumentation Mining: State of the Art and Emerging Trends. ACM TRANSACTIONS ON INTERNET TECHNOLOGY. 16: 2 (Article Number: 10). {{doi|10.1145/2850417}} Published: APR 2016 [https://www.researchgate.net/publication/299548392_Argumentation_Mining] | ||
* [[:en:Watson (computer)]] | * [[:en:Watson (computer)]] | ||
+ | * Debatepedia, pro-con debates about e.g. Occupy protests [http://www.debatepedia.org/en/index.php/Debate:_Occupy_protests] | ||
+ | * [[:en:Support vector machine]] |
Latest revision as of 10:15, 5 July 2017
Pragma-dialectics is a method of argumentation developed by Frans Ven Eemeren and Rob Grootendorst from the University of Amsterdam. For details, see en:pragma-dialectics.
Related literature
- Henry Farrell (George Washington University), Cosma Shalizi (Carnegie Mellon University and The Santa Fe Institute)An Outline of Cognitive Democracy. [1]
- Lippi, Marco; Torroni, Paolo. Argumentation Mining: State of the Art and Emerging Trends. ACM TRANSACTIONS ON INTERNET TECHNOLOGY. 16: 2 (Article Number: 10). doi:10.1145/2850417 Published: APR 2016 [2]
- en:Watson (computer)
- Debatepedia, pro-con debates about e.g. Occupy protests [3]
- en:Support vector machine