Difference between revisions of "Talk:Assessment of the health impacts of H1N1 vaccination"

From Testiwiki
Jump to: navigation, search
m
m
Line 17: Line 17:
 
* [[Talk:Assessment of the health impacts of H1N1 vaccination/Group D]]
 
* [[Talk:Assessment of the health impacts of H1N1 vaccination/Group D]]
 
* [[Talk:Assessment of the health impacts of H1N1 vaccination/Group E]]
 
* [[Talk:Assessment of the health impacts of H1N1 vaccination/Group E]]
 +
 +
 +
'''Additional material:
 +
* [[:File:Swine flu story.ppt]]
 +
* [[Decision analysis and risk management#See also]]

Revision as of 21:11, 31 March 2011

Pandemrix should not be used because of narcolepsy risk

How to read discussions

Statements: Pandemrix should not be used any more anywhere because its narcolepsy risk is too high.

Resolution: Resolution not yet found.

(A stable resolution, when found, should be updated to the main page.)

Argumentation:

1 : Despite risks, Pandemrix is an effective vaccine and has clearly net positive effects in countries where emergency treatment is poorly available for severe swine flu cases. --Jouni 23:05, 31 March 2011 (EEST)

2 : The reputation of Pandemrix is globally so poor that it is impossible to use it any more. --Jouni 23:05, 31 March 2011 (EEST)

3 : In Finland, THL decided to stop the use of Pandemrix. --Jouni 23:05, 31 March 2011 (EEST), [1]


Discussion groups:


Additional material: