Difference between revisions of "Talk:Assessment of the health impacts of H1N1 vaccination"
(→Pandemrix should not be used because of narcolepsy risk: technical corrections) |
(→Pandemrix should not be used because of narcolepsy risk: Group E) |
||
Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
|Resolution= | |Resolution= | ||
|Argumentation = | |Argumentation = | ||
+ | {{defend|B10 |All data compiled to date indicate that pandemic vaccines including Pandemrix match the excellent safety profile of seasonal influenza vaccines, which have been used for more than 60 years.|--[[User:Oluyemitoyinbo|Oluyemitoyinbo]] 11:12, 1 April 2011 (EEST)}} | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{defend|B11 |Adjuvanted vaccines commonly provide a stronger immune response than unadjuvanted vaccines and also provide a broader immune response allowing for some potential drift of the influenza virus (Pandemrix is an adjuvanted vaccine).|--[[User:Oluyemitoyinbo|Oluyemitoyinbo]] 11:12, 1 April 2011 (EEST)}} | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{defend|B12 |The number of cases of side effects of H1N1 vaccines (including Pandemrix) is in line with normal background rates on a population basis, as reported in a recent study European Medicines Agency |--[[User:Oluyemitoyinbo|Oluyemitoyinbo]] 11:12, 1 April 2011 (EEST)}} | ||
+ | |||
{{attack|1 |Despite risks, Pandemrix is an effective vaccine and has clearly net positive effects in countries where emergency treatment is poorly available for severe swine flu cases.|--[[User:Jouni|Jouni]] 23:05, 31 March 2011 (EEST)}} | {{attack|1 |Despite risks, Pandemrix is an effective vaccine and has clearly net positive effects in countries where emergency treatment is poorly available for severe swine flu cases.|--[[User:Jouni|Jouni]] 23:05, 31 March 2011 (EEST)}} | ||
Revision as of 08:20, 1 April 2011
Darm exercise 4
Tasks:
- Make pairs and select one group A-E (D and E have Finnish material).
- Look at page Discussion for theoretical and practical advice. Also page op_fi:Keskustelun jälkijäsentäminen may be useful.
- Look at the two or three links on your group's page.
- Read the texts and try to identify arguments about the use of Pandemrix. Note that arguments can be (and most are) indirect arguments.
- Rewrite the arguments in such a way that they can be understood outside the original context.
- Place the arguments into a hierarchical tree of attacking and defending arguments pointing toward the main statement about Pandemrix use.
- You can also make up your own arguments, or if you have extra time, read additional material (see end of the page).
- When each group has done their own part, there will be a general discussion about all argumentations by the groups. All argumentations will be merged onto this page based on the discussion.
- Think: How many readers do you need to make this extra effort of collecting, organising and synthesising information and opinions a worthwhile activity of social learning?
Pandemrix should not be used because of narcolepsy risk
Statements: Pandemrix should not be used any more anywhere because its narcolepsy risk is too high.
Resolution: Resolution not yet found. (A stable resolution, when found, should be updated to the main page.) |
Argumentation:
←B10 : All data compiled to date indicate that pandemic vaccines including Pandemrix match the excellent safety profile of seasonal influenza vaccines, which have been used for more than 60 years. --Oluyemitoyinbo 11:12, 1 April 2011 (EEST) ←B11 : Adjuvanted vaccines commonly provide a stronger immune response than unadjuvanted vaccines and also provide a broader immune response allowing for some potential drift of the influenza virus (Pandemrix is an adjuvanted vaccine). --Oluyemitoyinbo 11:12, 1 April 2011 (EEST) ←B12 : The number of cases of side effects of H1N1 vaccines (including Pandemrix) is in line with normal background rates on a population basis, as reported in a recent study European Medicines Agency --Oluyemitoyinbo 11:12, 1 April 2011 (EEST) ⇤1 : Despite risks, Pandemrix is an effective vaccine and has clearly net positive effects in countries where emergency treatment is poorly available for severe swine flu cases. --Jouni 23:05, 31 March 2011 (EEST) ←2 : The reputation of Pandemrix is globally so poor that it is impossible to use it any more. --Jouni 23:05, 31 March 2011 (EEST)
⇤E4 : The side effects of Pandemrix have been accentuated, although the benefits are much more significant. --Sallamari Tynkkynen 10:50, 1 April 2011 (EEST) [6] ⇤E5 : Nursing staff in hospitals should be vaccinated; it is their responsibility as medical professionals. --Sallamari Tynkkynen 10:54, 1 April 2011 (EEST) [7] |
Discussion groups:
- Talk:Assessment of the health impacts of H1N1 vaccination/Group A
- Talk:Assessment of the health impacts of H1N1 vaccination/Group B
- Talk:Assessment of the health impacts of H1N1 vaccination/Group C
- Talk:Assessment of the health impacts of H1N1 vaccination/Group D (Finnish material)
- Talk:Assessment of the health impacts of H1N1 vaccination/Group E (Finnish material)
Additional material: