Difference between revisions of "Talk:Assessment of the health impacts of H1N1 vaccination/Group A"
(→Pandemrix should not be used because of narcolepsy risk) |
(→Pandemrix should not be used because of narcolepsy risk) |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
{{attack|2 |The overall annual incidence of narcolepsy remained consistent with prevaccination scenarios|--[[User:Jacob Attipoe|Jacob Attipoe]] 11:22, 1 April 2011 (EEST)}} | {{attack|2 |The overall annual incidence of narcolepsy remained consistent with prevaccination scenarios|--[[User:Jacob Attipoe|Jacob Attipoe]] 11:22, 1 April 2011 (EEST)}} | ||
| − | {{defend|1 |Even though a nine fold increase in narcolepsy was found in vaccinated population, the occurrence of narcolepsy was still very rare with this apparent increase. A number of different reasons may account for the observed rise in the incidence of narcolepsy namely: | + | {{defend|1 |Even though a nine fold increase in narcolepsy was found in vaccinated population, the occurrence of narcolepsy was still very rare with this apparent increase. A number of different reasons may account for the observed rise in the incidence of narcolepsy namely: (H1N1) infection, vaccination, combined effect of infection and vaccination, or some other factor entirely. Infections have been documented as causing narcolepsy.|--[[User:Jacob Attipoe|Jacob Attipoe]] 11:18, 1 April 2011 (EEST)}} |
:{{attack|1 |No similar increase in incidence of narcolepsy is reported in other Nordic countries. Canada has extensively used this type of vaccine with no evidence of increased risk for narcolepsy|--[[User:Jacob Attipoe|Jacob Attipoe]] 11:18, 1 April 2011 (EEST)}} | :{{attack|1 |No similar increase in incidence of narcolepsy is reported in other Nordic countries. Canada has extensively used this type of vaccine with no evidence of increased risk for narcolepsy|--[[User:Jacob Attipoe|Jacob Attipoe]] 11:18, 1 April 2011 (EEST)}} | ||
{{defend|2 |as there is presently no swine flu epidemic in Finland, there is no immediate need for swine flu vaccination|--[[User:Jacob Attipoe|Jacob Attipoe]] 11:18, 1 April 2011 (EEST)}} | {{defend|2 |as there is presently no swine flu epidemic in Finland, there is no immediate need for swine flu vaccination|--[[User:Jacob Attipoe|Jacob Attipoe]] 11:18, 1 April 2011 (EEST)}} | ||
Revision as of 08:27, 1 April 2011
Pandemrix should not be used because of narcolepsy risk
| Statements: Pandemrix should not be used any more anywhere because its narcolepsy risk is too high. NOTE! The time of the statement is September 2010.
Resolution: Resolution not yet found. (A stable resolution, when found, should be updated to the main page.) |
| Argumentation:
⇤1 : Despite risks, Pandemrix is an effective vaccine and has clearly net positive effects in countries where emergency treatment is poorly available for severe swine flu cases. --Jouni 23:05, 31 March 2011 (EEST) ⇤1 : According to EMA, data received so far is still insufficient to establish a causal relationship between Pandemrix and narcolepsy. One possible explanation for the results is that Pandemrix could interact with unknown local environmental and/or genetic factor in contributing to the increased risk of narcolepsy among the vaccinated population aged 4 to 19 years in Finland --Jacob Attipoe 11:18, 1 April 2011 (EEST) ⇤2 : The overall annual incidence of narcolepsy remained consistent with prevaccination scenarios --Jacob Attipoe 11:22, 1 April 2011 (EEST) ←1 : Even though a nine fold increase in narcolepsy was found in vaccinated population, the occurrence of narcolepsy was still very rare with this apparent increase. A number of different reasons may account for the observed rise in the incidence of narcolepsy namely: (H1N1) infection, vaccination, combined effect of infection and vaccination, or some other factor entirely. Infections have been documented as causing narcolepsy. --Jacob Attipoe 11:18, 1 April 2011 (EEST)
←2 : as there is presently no swine flu epidemic in Finland, there is no immediate need for swine flu vaccination --Jacob Attipoe 11:18, 1 April 2011 (EEST) ←2 : The reputation of Pandemrix is globally so poor that it is impossible to use it any more. --Jouni 23:05, 31 March 2011 (EEST) |
