Difference between revisions of "Talk:Assessment of the health impacts of H1N1 vaccination/Group D"

From Testiwiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(→‎Pandemrix should not be used because of narcolepsy risk)
(→‎Pandemrix should not be used because of narcolepsy risk)
Line 10: Line 10:
 
{{comment|# |The decision to use Pandemrix was probably led by panic and other choices should be considered at this point|--[[User:Carmen Gil|Carmen Gil]] 11:25, 1 April 2011 (EEST)}}
 
{{comment|# |The decision to use Pandemrix was probably led by panic and other choices should be considered at this point|--[[User:Carmen Gil|Carmen Gil]] 11:25, 1 April 2011 (EEST)}}
 
::{{defend|# |Finland used a vaccination with additives, against the recommendation of WHO|--[[User:Carmen Gil|Carmen Gil]] 11:25, 1 April 2011 (EEST)}}
 
::{{defend|# |Finland used a vaccination with additives, against the recommendation of WHO|--[[User:Carmen Gil|Carmen Gil]] 11:25, 1 April 2011 (EEST)}}
−
:::{{defend|# |Additives can cause flu-like symptoms, increasing the public's opinion against vaccination|--[[User:Carmen Gil|Carmen Gil]] 11:25, 1 April 2011 (EEST)}}
+
:::{{branch|# |Additives can cause flu-like symptoms, increasing the public's opinion against vaccination|--[[User:Carmen Gil|Carmen Gil]] 11:25, 1 April 2011 (EEST)}}
 +
 
 
{{defend|2 |The reputation of Pandemrix is globally so poor that it is impossible to use it any more.|--[[User:Jouni|Jouni]] 23:05, 31 March 2011 (EEST)}}
 
{{defend|2 |The reputation of Pandemrix is globally so poor that it is impossible to use it any more.|--[[User:Jouni|Jouni]] 23:05, 31 March 2011 (EEST)}}
  

Revision as of 08:37, 1 April 2011

Pandemrix should not be used because of narcolepsy risk

How to read discussions

Statements: Pandemrix should not be used any more anywhere because its narcolepsy risk is too high. NOTE! The time of the statement is September 2010.

Resolution: Resolution not yet found.

(A stable resolution, when found, should be updated to the main page.)

Argumentation:

⇤1 : Despite risks, Pandemrix is an effective vaccine and has clearly net positive effects in countries where emergency treatment is poorly available for severe swine flu cases. --Jouni 23:05, 31 March 2011 (EEST)

⇤# : Side effects are still there and will be treated poorly in these countries --Carmen Gil 11:25, 1 April 2011 (EEST)

--# : The decision to use Pandemrix was probably led by panic and other choices should be considered at this point --Carmen Gil 11:25, 1 April 2011 (EEST)

←# : Finland used a vaccination with additives, against the recommendation of WHO --Carmen Gil 11:25, 1 April 2011 (EEST)
→# : Additives can cause flu-like symptoms, increasing the public's opinion against vaccination --Carmen Gil 11:25, 1 April 2011 (EEST)

←2 : The reputation of Pandemrix is globally so poor that it is impossible to use it any more. --Jouni 23:05, 31 March 2011 (EEST)

←3 : In Finland, THL decided to stop the use of Pandemrix. --Jouni 23:05, 31 March 2011 (EEST), [1]

⇤# : Pandemrix has a lower Hg content than other vaccines (2.5 vs 25 µg), which could cause other neurological problems in children --Carmen Gil 11:25, 1 April 2011 (EEST)

Retrieved from "http://www.opasnet.org/testiwiki/index.php?title=Talk:Assessment_of_the_health_impacts_of_H1N1_vaccination/Group_D&oldid=19815"