Difference between revisions of "Talk:Assessment on impacts of emission trading on city-level (ET-CL)"

From Testiwiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(old discussions archived)
(power consumption statement)
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
==Inclusion of power consumption==
 +
 +
{{discussion
 +
|Dispute= Power consumption can be left out of the core assessment
 +
|Outcome= Under discussion (to be changed when a conclusion is found)
 +
|Argumentation =
 +
Add argumentation using attack-, defend- and comment buttons
 +
{{defend|1: |Combined heat and power production in Helsinki Metropolitan area supplies about all of the power demand within that same region. It can be thus assumed that the impacts of producing the power that is imported to the region are thus negligible compared to the impacts of local CHP and traffic. As also the city-level decisions to be considered do not include decisions directly related to power consumption, it appears reasonable that considerations regarding power consumption can well be left to the optional extensions of the assessment.|--[[User:Mikko Pohjola|Mikko Pohjola]] 08:55, 27 January 2009 (EET)}}
 +
}}
 +
 +
 
==Archived discussions==
 
==Archived discussions==
  

Revision as of 06:55, 27 January 2009

Inclusion of power consumption

How to read discussions

Statements:

Resolution: Resolution not yet found.

(A stable resolution, when found, should be updated to the main page.)

Argumentation:

Add argumentation using attack-, defend- and comment buttons 1: : Combined heat and power production in Helsinki Metropolitan area supplies about all of the power demand within that same region. It can be thus assumed that the impacts of producing the power that is imported to the region are thus negligible compared to the impacts of local CHP and traffic. As also the city-level decisions to be considered do not include decisions directly related to power consumption, it appears reasonable that considerations regarding power consumption can well be left to the optional extensions of the assessment. --Mikko Pohjola 08:55, 27 January 2009 (EET)


Archived discussions

The contents of the previous unstructured discussions regarding

  1. possible decision options regarding phase III EU-ETS
  2. potential relevant city-level climate change mitigation measures within the Helsinki metropolitan area
  3. draft planning of a sub assessment to this assessment to be done as a master's thesis experimental work

are already mostly merged to their relevant assessment pages. Therefore the discussion was archived and can be found by following this link