Difference between revisions of "Talk:Benefit-risk assessment of fish and related policy options"
From Testiwiki
(New page: Maybe we could narrow down the topic more. By excluding microbiological risks, the topic could be like "Nutritional benefits & chemical risks of fish consumption and related policy options...) |
m |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | Maybe we could narrow down the topic more. By excluding microbiological risks, the topic could be like "Nutritional benefits & chemical risks of fish consumption and related policy options about using fish for human food". I think this topic sounds too plastic and we should work on this more, but this statement is just a starting point to discussions about issue. | + | Maybe we could narrow down the topic more. By excluding microbiological risks, the topic could be like "Nutritional benefits & chemical risks of fish consumption and related policy options about using fish for human food". I think this topic sounds too plastic and we should work on this more, but this statement is just a starting point to discussions about issue. --[[User:Olli|Olli]] 10:45, 17 April 2007 (EEST) |
Revision as of 07:45, 17 April 2007
Maybe we could narrow down the topic more. By excluding microbiological risks, the topic could be like "Nutritional benefits & chemical risks of fish consumption and related policy options about using fish for human food". I think this topic sounds too plastic and we should work on this more, but this statement is just a starting point to discussions about issue. --Olli 10:45, 17 April 2007 (EEST)
