Difference between revisions of "Talk:Benefit-risk assessment of methyl mercury and omega-3 fatty acids in fish"
From Testiwiki
m |
(Parameters corrected) |
||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
{{discussion | {{discussion | ||
− | | | + | |Statements= Potential scenarios |
− | | | + | |Resolution= |
− | |Argumentation ={{comment| | + | |Argumentation ={{comment|1|Referring to our discussions on the potential scenarios I think we should additionally consider either including one more category named "pregnant women with no fish consumption" or maybe changing the third category to "pregnant women with low or no fish consumption".|--[[User:Anna Karjalainen|Anna Karjalainen]] 12:16, 22 August 2007 (EEST)}} |
− | {{defend| | + | {{defend|2|This fifth percentile in consumption of pregnant mothers is supposed to act as (very) low or no fish consumption scenario. I'll modify the name of the scenario.|--[[User:Olli|Olli]] 08:12, 23 August 2007 (EEST)}} |
}} | }} |
Revision as of 13:16, 16 November 2009
moved from beneris:Talk:Risk assessment of MeHg and n-3 fatty acids in fish -- Jouni 15:23, 15 February 2008 (EET)
Potential scenarios
Statements: Potential scenarios
Resolution: Resolution not yet found. (A stable resolution, when found, should be updated to the main page.) |
Argumentation:
--1: Referring to our discussions on the potential scenarios I think we should additionally consider either including one more category named "pregnant women with no fish consumption" or maybe changing the third category to "pregnant women with low or no fish consumption". --Anna Karjalainen 12:16, 22 August 2007 (EEST) ←2: This fifth percentile in consumption of pregnant mothers is supposed to act as (very) low or no fish consumption scenario. I'll modify the name of the scenario. --Olli 08:12, 23 August 2007 (EEST) |