Difference between revisions of "Talk:Benefit-risk assessment of methyl mercury and omega-3 fatty acids in fish"

From Testiwiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Parameters corrected)
(discussion resolved)
 
Line 4: Line 4:
  
 
{{discussion
 
{{discussion
−
|Statements= Potential scenarios
+
|Statements= A scenario about low or no fish intake should be added.
−
|Resolution=  
+
|Resolution= Accepted.
−
|Argumentation ={{comment|1|Referring to our discussions on the potential scenarios I think we should additionally consider either including one more category named "pregnant women with no fish consumption" or maybe changing the third category to "pregnant women with low or no fish consumption".|--[[User:Anna Karjalainen|Anna Karjalainen]] 12:16, 22 August 2007 (EEST)}}
+
|Resolved  = Yes
−
 
+
|Argumentation =
−
{{defend|2|This fifth percentile in consumption of pregnant mothers is supposed to act as (very) low or no fish consumption scenario. I'll modify the name of the scenario.|--[[User:Olli|Olli]] 08:12, 23 August 2007 (EEST)}}
+
:{{defend|1|Referring to our discussions on the potential scenarios I think we should additionally consider either including one more category named "pregnant women with no fish consumption" or maybe changing the third category to "pregnant women with low or no fish consumption".|--[[User:Anna Karjalainen|Anna Karjalainen]] 12:16, 22 August 2007 (EEST)}}
 +
::{{defend|2|This fifth percentile in consumption of pregnant mothers is supposed to act as (very) low or no fish consumption scenario. I'll modify the name of the scenario.|--[[User:Olli|Olli]] 08:12, 23 August 2007 (EEST)}}
 
}}
 
}}

Latest revision as of 13:43, 14 January 2010

moved from beneris:Talk:Risk assessment of MeHg and n-3 fatty acids in fish -- Jouni 15:23, 15 February 2008 (EET)

Potential scenarios

How to read discussions

Statements: A scenario about low or no fish intake should be added.

Resolution: Accepted.

(Resolved, i.e., the resolution has been updated to the main page.)

Argumentation:
←1: Referring to our discussions on the potential scenarios I think we should additionally consider either including one more category named "pregnant women with no fish consumption" or maybe changing the third category to "pregnant women with low or no fish consumption". --Anna Karjalainen 12:16, 22 August 2007 (EEST)
←2: This fifth percentile in consumption of pregnant mothers is supposed to act as (very) low or no fish consumption scenario. I'll modify the name of the scenario. --Olli 08:12, 23 August 2007 (EEST)
Retrieved from "http://www.opasnet.org/testiwiki/index.php?title=Talk:Benefit-risk_assessment_of_methyl_mercury_and_omega-3_fatty_acids_in_fish&oldid=14346"