Difference between revisions of "Talk:Concentration-response to PM2.5"
From Testiwiki
(-- ~~~~) |
m |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Jouni: "Issues relating to uncertainty could be written under results, rather than scope. The shape of the distribution should not be included here, since it restricts us from updating our model should we come across data at a later stage that suggests different distributions." Added by [[User:Jgrellier|Jgrellier]] 15:39, 19 February 2008 (EET) | Jouni: "Issues relating to uncertainty could be written under results, rather than scope. The shape of the distribution should not be included here, since it restricts us from updating our model should we come across data at a later stage that suggests different distributions." Added by [[User:Jgrellier|Jgrellier]] 15:39, 19 February 2008 (EET) | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{comment|#(number): |The result should contain the actual distributions (or descriptive statistic such as mean, SD, and a few fractiles.|--[[User:Jouni|Jouni]] 13:58, 21 February 2008 (EET)}} | ||
Revision as of 11:58, 21 February 2008
-- Jgrellier 15:39, 19 February 2008 (EET)
Jouni: "Issues relating to uncertainty could be written under results, rather than scope. The shape of the distribution should not be included here, since it restricts us from updating our model should we come across data at a later stage that suggests different distributions." Added by Jgrellier 15:39, 19 February 2008 (EET)
--#(number): : The result should contain the actual distributions (or descriptive statistic such as mean, SD, and a few fractiles. --Jouni 13:58, 21 February 2008 (EET)
