Difference between revisions of "Talk:Concentrations of beneficial nutrients in fish"
Juha Villman (talk | contribs) m (corrected argumentation numbering) |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
|Dispute= Treatment of vitamins B as summed up | |Dispute= Treatment of vitamins B as summed up | ||
|Outcome= Under discussion (to be changed when a conclusion is found) | |Outcome= Under discussion (to be changed when a conclusion is found) | ||
| − | |Argumentation ={{comment|#( | + | |Argumentation ={{comment|#(1): | Incorporation of vitamins B does not reflect any functional entity and its usefulness or rather other manner of representation needs to be further reassessed.|--[[User:Anna Karjalainen|Anna Karjalainen]] 22:09, 5 November 2007 (EET)}} |
}} | }} | ||
| Line 39: | Line 39: | ||
|Outcome= Under discussion (to be changed when a conclusion is found) | |Outcome= Under discussion (to be changed when a conclusion is found) | ||
|Argumentation = | |Argumentation = | ||
| − | {{comment|#( | + | {{comment|#(1): |Justifiable procedure in author judgement would be to use name(s) of the author(s) used --> here e.g. (Leino O., 2007). Scientific information should always be citable. |--[[User:Anna Karjalainen|Anna Karjalainen]] 16:51, 20 November 2007 (EET)}}}} |
| Line 46: | Line 46: | ||
|Outcome= Under discussion (to be changed when a conclusion is found) | |Outcome= Under discussion (to be changed when a conclusion is found) | ||
|Argumentation = | |Argumentation = | ||
| − | {{defend|#( | + | {{defend|#(1): |Explanation of the rationale about the chosen distribution is highly useful and justifiable.|--[[User:Anna Karjalainen|Anna Karjalainen]] 17:17, 20 November 2007 (EET)}} |
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 07:53, 4 November 2009
| Statements:
Resolution: Resolution not yet found. (A stable resolution, when found, should be updated to the main page.) |
| Argumentation:
--#(1): : Incorporation of vitamins B does not reflect any functional entity and its usefulness or rather other manner of representation needs to be further reassessed. --Anna Karjalainen 22:09, 5 November 2007 (EET) |
Should the variable restrict to Finland?
| Statements:
Resolution: Resolution not yet found. (A stable resolution, when found, should be updated to the main page.) |
| Argumentation:
⇤#(number): : It is easier to compare results when they are in one place. In addition, often the fish don't follow national boundaries. --Jouni 11:34, 10 February 2008 (EET) |
Number of samples
| Statements:
Resolution: Resolution not yet found. (A stable resolution, when found, should be updated to the main page.) |
| Argumentation:
⇤#(1): : There are species with only two samples. Is this enough? --Olli 15:22, 17 September 2007 (EEST)
|
Omega-3 data
| Statements:
Resolution: Resolution not yet found. (A stable resolution, when found, should be updated to the main page.) |
| Argumentation:
⇤#(1): : Only mean values of omega-3 concentration are used. The data could be more extensive? --Olli 15:28, 17 September 2007 (EEST)
|
| Statements:
Resolution: Resolution not yet found. (A stable resolution, when found, should be updated to the main page.) |
| Argumentation:
--#(1): : Justifiable procedure in author judgement would be to use name(s) of the author(s) used --> here e.g. (Leino O., 2007). Scientific information should always be citable. --Anna Karjalainen 16:51, 20 November 2007 (EET) |
| Statements:
Resolution: Resolution not yet found. (A stable resolution, when found, should be updated to the main page.) |
| Argumentation:
←#(1): : Explanation of the rationale about the chosen distribution is highly useful and justifiable. --Anna Karjalainen 17:17, 20 November 2007 (EET) |
