Difference between revisions of "Talk:Dioxin exposure-response function on population level"
m (Variable Talk:Dioxin exposure-response function on population level moved to Talk:Dioxin exposure-response function on population level: Reformatting variables) |
(Parameters corrected) |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
{{Discussion | {{Discussion | ||
− | | | + | |Statements = Ambiguity with Health effects of dioxins must be resolved |
− | | | + | |Resolution = This variable is exposure-response, ''Health effects of dioxins'' is a health estimate. |
|Argumentation = {{Defend|1|The variables ''Responses of dioxin exposure on human health at the population level'' (originally ''Dioxin exposure-response function on population level'') and ''Health effects of dioxins'' are ambiguous. The first one should tell about the exposure-response function, i.e. the amount of health effect per unit exposure. The second one should tell the amount of health effect in a given situation and exposure. Taking the two variables together, the dose-response is already well characterized (although childhood effects may need more scrutiny), but the actual health effect estimates for Hämeenkyrö are missing (which is, of course, not an easy question).|--[[User:Jouni|Jouni]] 07:17, 22 September 2006 (EEST)}} | |Argumentation = {{Defend|1|The variables ''Responses of dioxin exposure on human health at the population level'' (originally ''Dioxin exposure-response function on population level'') and ''Health effects of dioxins'' are ambiguous. The first one should tell about the exposure-response function, i.e. the amount of health effect per unit exposure. The second one should tell the amount of health effect in a given situation and exposure. Taking the two variables together, the dose-response is already well characterized (although childhood effects may need more scrutiny), but the actual health effect estimates for Hämeenkyrö are missing (which is, of course, not an easy question).|--[[User:Jouni|Jouni]] 07:17, 22 September 2006 (EEST)}} | ||
Revision as of 08:41, 16 November 2009
Scope/Ambiguity with Health effects of dioxins
Statements: Ambiguity with Health effects of dioxins must be resolved
Resolution: This variable is exposure-response, Health effects of dioxins is a health estimate. (A stable resolution, when found, should be updated to the main page.) |
Argumentation:
←1: The variables Responses of dioxin exposure on human health at the population level (originally Dioxin exposure-response function on population level) and Health effects of dioxins are ambiguous. The first one should tell about the exposure-response function, i.e. the amount of health effect per unit exposure. The second one should tell the amount of health effect in a given situation and exposure. Taking the two variables together, the dose-response is already well characterized (although childhood effects may need more scrutiny), but the actual health effect estimates for Hämeenkyrö are missing (which is, of course, not an easy question). --Jouni 07:17, 22 September 2006 (EEST)
|