Difference between revisions of "Talk:Disability weights"
From Testiwiki
(Parameters corrected) |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
{{discussion | {{discussion | ||
| − | | | + | |Statements= Is "formula" the right place for this excel table? If not, where should the table be? If it is the right place, I think "formula" is a wrong name. |
| − | | | + | |Resolution= |
|Argumentation = | |Argumentation = | ||
Add argumentation using attack-, defend- and comment buttons | Add argumentation using attack-, defend- and comment buttons | ||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
{{discussion | {{discussion | ||
| − | | | + | |Statements= Normalizing DALY weights has been proposed as a solution towards the fact that uncertainty in smaal DALY weights affect overall uncertainty much more than uncertainty in large weights. Does anyone know how this might work? |
| − | | | + | |Resolution= |
|Argumentation = | |Argumentation = | ||
Add argumentation using attack-, defend- and comment buttons | Add argumentation using attack-, defend- and comment buttons | ||
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 13:24, 16 November 2009
Formula?
| Statements: Is "formula" the right place for this excel table? If not, where should the table be? If it is the right place, I think "formula" is a wrong name.
Resolution: Resolution not yet found. (A stable resolution, when found, should be updated to the main page.) |
| Argumentation:
Add argumentation using attack-, defend- and comment buttons |
Normalizing DALY weights?
| Statements: Normalizing DALY weights has been proposed as a solution towards the fact that uncertainty in smaal DALY weights affect overall uncertainty much more than uncertainty in large weights. Does anyone know how this might work?
Resolution: Resolution not yet found. (A stable resolution, when found, should be updated to the main page.) |
| Argumentation:
Add argumentation using attack-, defend- and comment buttons |
