Difference between revisions of "Talk:Disability weights"

From Testiwiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Parameters corrected)
m (moved Talk:DALY weights to Talk:Disability weights: This is the correct term.)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
==Peer review==
 +
 +
{{peer review
 +
|reviewers = [[User:Jouni|Jouni]] 22:45, 28 April 2008 (EEST)
 +
|respect  = 2
 +
|class    = Technical report
 +
|evalutation = The variable is in preliminary stage.}}
 +
 +
 
== Formula? ==
 
== Formula? ==
  

Latest revision as of 15:17, 13 January 2011

Peer review

Peer review
This page has been peer reviewed.
The page belongs to class Technical report.
The amount of respect is 2 onors.


Reviewers: Jouni 22:45, 28 April 2008 (EEST)

The basis for the review is the quality and applicability of content for a potential reader. The target population may be different for different classes. See possible classes and typical respects.



Formula?

How to read discussions

Statements: Is "formula" the right place for this excel table? If not, where should the table be? If it is the right place, I think "formula" is a wrong name.

Resolution: Resolution not yet found.

(A stable resolution, when found, should be updated to the main page.)

Argumentation:

Add argumentation using attack-, defend- and comment buttons


Normalizing DALY weights?

How to read discussions

Statements: Normalizing DALY weights has been proposed as a solution towards the fact that uncertainty in smaal DALY weights affect overall uncertainty much more than uncertainty in large weights. Does anyone know how this might work?

Resolution: Resolution not yet found.

(A stable resolution, when found, should be updated to the main page.)

Argumentation:

Add argumentation using attack-, defend- and comment buttons