Difference between revisions of "Talk:Disability weights"
From Testiwiki
m (Formula?) |
|||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
{{discussion | {{discussion | ||
|Dispute= Is "formula" the right place for this excel table? If not, where should the table be? If it is the right place, I think "formula" is a wrong name. | |Dispute= Is "formula" the right place for this excel table? If not, where should the table be? If it is the right place, I think "formula" is a wrong name. | ||
| + | |Outcome= Under discussion (to be changed when a conclusion is found) | ||
| + | |Argumentation = | ||
| + | Add argumentation using attack-, defend- and comment buttons | ||
| + | }} | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Normalizing DALY weights? == | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{discussion | ||
| + | |Dispute= Normalizing DALY weights has been proposed as a solution towards the fact that uncertainty in smaal DALY weights affect overall uncertainty much more than uncertainty in large weights. Does anyone know how this might work? | ||
|Outcome= Under discussion (to be changed when a conclusion is found) | |Outcome= Under discussion (to be changed when a conclusion is found) | ||
|Argumentation = | |Argumentation = | ||
Add argumentation using attack-, defend- and comment buttons | Add argumentation using attack-, defend- and comment buttons | ||
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 12:39, 17 February 2009
Formula?
| Statements:
Resolution: Resolution not yet found. (A stable resolution, when found, should be updated to the main page.) |
| Argumentation:
Add argumentation using attack-, defend- and comment buttons |
Normalizing DALY weights?
| Statements:
Resolution: Resolution not yet found. (A stable resolution, when found, should be updated to the main page.) |
| Argumentation:
Add argumentation using attack-, defend- and comment buttons |
