Difference between revisions of "Talk:Domestic fish consumption of the general population in Finland"
From Testiwiki
Juha Villman (talk | contribs) |
(discussion moved back from heande:Domestic fish consumption of the general population in Finland) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | # | + | == moved from [[Variable Talk:Domestic fish consumption of the general population]] -- [[User:Jouni|Jouni]] 10:16, 10 February 2008 (EET) == |
| + | |||
| + | == Imported fish? == | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{discussion | ||
| + | |Dispute= What is the effect of imported fish | ||
| + | |Outcome= The scope is domestic fish as data for imported fish is much weaker | ||
| + | |Argumentation = | ||
| + | {{comment|#(1): |Is methyl mercury and omega-3 exposure from domestic fish consumption the prevailing one? You should include exposure from imported fish consumption to the model|--[[User:Olli|Olli]] 15:34, 17 September 2007 (EEST)}} | ||
| + | :{{defend|#(1): |You are right. The problem is that concentration data for imported fish is unavailable. With only domestic fish consumption, we attain a better estimate for this risk-benefit comparison|--[[User:Olli|Olli]] 15:34, 17 September 2007 (EEST)}} | ||
| + | }} | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | == Loss of fish during process == | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{discussion | ||
| + | |Dispute= What is the loss of fish meat while processing fish? | ||
| + | |Outcome= The variable includes this loss of fish during the processing | ||
| + | |Argumentation = | ||
| + | {{attack|#(1): |You should include the fact that a proportion of fishery catch is not used for human consumption, but it goes to waste and for other purposes|--[[User:Olli|Olli]] 15:45, 17 September 2007 (EEST)}} | ||
| + | :{{attack|#(1): |This has been taken into account in this variable|--[[User:Olli|Olli]] 15:45, 17 September 2007 (EEST)}} | ||
| + | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 08:34, 3 January 2012
moved from Variable Talk:Domestic fish consumption of the general population -- Jouni 10:16, 10 February 2008 (EET)
Imported fish?
| Statements:
Resolution: Resolution not yet found. (A stable resolution, when found, should be updated to the main page.) |
| Argumentation:
--#(1): : Is methyl mercury and omega-3 exposure from domestic fish consumption the prevailing one? You should include exposure from imported fish consumption to the model --Olli 15:34, 17 September 2007 (EEST)
|
Loss of fish during process
| Statements:
Resolution: Resolution not yet found. (A stable resolution, when found, should be updated to the main page.) |
| Argumentation:
⇤#(1): : You should include the fact that a proportion of fishery catch is not used for human consumption, but it goes to waste and for other purposes --Olli 15:45, 17 September 2007 (EEST)
|
