Difference between revisions of "Talk:ERF of methyl mercury on intelligence quotient"
(moved from Beneris -- ~~~~) |
Juha Villman (talk | contribs) m (typo correction) |
||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
{{discussion | {{discussion | ||
− | |Dispute= Is the toxicology of methylmercury | + | |Dispute= Is the toxicology of methylmercury known enough to get a reliable result? |
|Outcome= More research is needed | |Outcome= More research is needed | ||
|Argumentation = | |Argumentation = |
Revision as of 11:37, 4 November 2009
moved from Beneris -- Jouni 11:28, 14 February 2008 (EET)
Toxicology of methylmercury
Statements:
Resolution: Resolution not yet found. (A stable resolution, when found, should be updated to the main page.) |
Argumentation:
⇤#(1): Is this variable toxicologically sound? --Olli 15:59, 17 September 2007 (EEST)
|
Statements:
Resolution: Resolution not yet found. (A stable resolution, when found, should be updated to the main page.) |
Argumentation:
--#(number): : Justifiable procedure in author judgement would be to use name(s) of the author(s) used --> here e.g. (Leino O., 2007). Scientific information should always be citable. Maybe even a short rationale about the chosen distribution would be needed. (While proposing this, I understand this may seen trivial to someone. However, to my understanding reference issues the method will anyway face sooner or later.) --Anna Karjalainen 16:51, 20 November 2007 (EET) |