Difference between revisions of "Talk:General assessment framework"
From Testiwiki
(New page: {{discussion |Dispute= Difference of CBA and BCA |Outcome= Under discussion (to be changed when a conclusion is found) |Argumentation = {{comment|#(number): |Is there a difference between ...) |
(resolution) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | {{discussion | + | {{discussion |Dispute= There is no difference between cost-benefit analysis and benefit-cost analysis. |Outcome= Accepted. |Argumentation = {{comment|#1: |Is there a difference between benefit cost analyses and cost benefit analyses?|--[[User:Alexandra Kuhn|Alexandra Kuhn]] 17:42, 6 March 2008 (EET)}} |
| − | |Dispute= | + | |
| − | |Outcome= | + | {{defend|#2: |There is no substantive difference. The traditional term is cost-benefit analysis. Then some marketing experts realised that the term would have a more positive connotation if the benefits were mentioned first. So, those economists who try to be positive talk about benefit-cost analysis.|--[[User:Jouni|Jouni]] 23:59, 7 March 2008 (EET)}} |
| − | |Argumentation = | ||
| − | {{comment|# | ||
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 21:59, 7 March 2008
| Statements:
Resolution: Resolution not yet found. (A stable resolution, when found, should be updated to the main page.) |
| Argumentation:
--#1: : Is there a difference between benefit cost analyses and cost benefit analyses? --Alexandra Kuhn 17:42, 6 March 2008 (EET) ←#2: : There is no substantive difference. The traditional term is cost-benefit analysis. Then some marketing experts realised that the term would have a more positive connotation if the benefits were mentioned first. So, those economists who try to be positive talk about benefit-cost analysis. --Jouni 23:59, 7 March 2008 (EET) |
