Difference between revisions of "Talk:Hämeenkyrö MSWI risk assessment: Fine particles"
(moved from main page) |
(→PM<sub>2.5</sub> emissions in Hämeenkyrö) |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
|Outcome = | |Outcome = | ||
|Argumentation = {{Defend|It is important to be able to compare different risks. Seeing emission values for each sector makes this easier. The new emissions from the plants can then be put into perspective with variables people can perceive: they may have previous experience or a feeling about the amount of smoke coming from homes, or factories.|--[[User:Jouni|Jouni]] 06:05, 22 September 2006 (EEST)--[[User:Päivi Roivainen|Päivi Roivainen]] 09:59, 22 September 2006 (EEST) | |Argumentation = {{Defend|It is important to be able to compare different risks. Seeing emission values for each sector makes this easier. The new emissions from the plants can then be put into perspective with variables people can perceive: they may have previous experience or a feeling about the amount of smoke coming from homes, or factories.|--[[User:Jouni|Jouni]] 06:05, 22 September 2006 (EEST)--[[User:Päivi Roivainen|Päivi Roivainen]] 09:59, 22 September 2006 (EEST) | ||
| + | }} | ||
| + | }} | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{Resolution | ||
| + | |Topic = Well-being of local population is not an input to this variable | ||
| + | |Statement = Well-being of local population is not an input to this variable | ||
| + | |Outcome = | ||
| + | |Argumentation = {{Defend|The whole emissions variable, and the PM<sub>2.5</sub> emissions in Hämeenkyrö as its subvariable, is an input to the well-being of local population variable, not vice versa| [[User:Mikko Pohjola|Mikko Pohjola]] 11:05, 26 September 2006 (EEST) | ||
}} | }} | ||
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 08:05, 26 September 2006
Contents
PM2.5 emissions in Hämeenkyrö
Päivi
| Statements:
Resolution: Resolution not yet found. (A stable resolution, when found, should be updated to the main page.) |
| Argumentation:
←It is important to be able to compare different risks. Seeing emission values for each sector makes this easier. The new emissions from the plants can then be put into perspective with variables people can perceive: they may have previous experience or a feeling about the amount of smoke coming from homes, or factories.: --Jouni 06:05, 22 September 2006 (EEST)--Päivi Roivainen 09:59, 22 September 2006 (EEST) {{{3}}} |
| Statements:
Resolution: Resolution not yet found. (A stable resolution, when found, should be updated to the main page.) |
| Argumentation:
<font color=green id=The whole emissions variable, and the PM2.5 emissions in Hämeenkyrö as its subvariable, is an input to the well-being of local population variable, not vice versa>←The whole emissions variable, and the PM2.5 emissions in Hämeenkyrö as its subvariable, is an input to the well-being of local population variable, not vice versa: Mikko Pohjola 11:05, 26 September 2006 (EEST) </font> {{{3}}} |
PM2.5 emissions from MSWI, biofuel plant, and natural gas plant in Hämeenkyrö
Tommi
Discussion on ...
| Statements:
Resolution: Resolution not yet found. (A stable resolution, when found, should be updated to the main page.) |
| Argumentation:
|
Baseline PM2.5 exposure in Hämeenkyrö
Anne K
Discussion on ...
| Statements:
Resolution: Resolution not yet found. (A stable resolution, when found, should be updated to the main page.) |
| Argumentation:
|
PM2.5 exposure due to MSWI in Hämeenkyrö
Terhi Y
Discussion on ...
| Statements:
Resolution: Resolution not yet found. (A stable resolution, when found, should be updated to the main page.) |
| Argumentation:
|
PM2.5 exposure-response function on population level
Sari
Discussion on ...
| Statements:
Resolution: Resolution not yet found. (A stable resolution, when found, should be updated to the main page.) |
| Argumentation:
|
