Difference between revisions of "Talk:Opasnet base structure"
m |
m (Talk:Result database moved to Talk:Opasnet base: The name is according to the new nomenclature.) |
(No difference)
| |
Revision as of 04:56, 29 November 2008
-- Jouni 11:39, 7 January 2008 (EET)
Should all variables go to result distribution database?
| Statements:
Resolution: Resolution not yet found. (A stable resolution, when found, should be updated to the main page.) |
| Argumentation:
←#(1 P): : There should be two levels of variables: 1) The results of important variables are uploaded in the result database, and they should be coherent with each other. 2) Other variables that are less important are used in case-specific assessments. They don't need to be coherent with all variables in the result database, only with those within the same assessment. --Jouni 23:52, 20 August 2007 (EEST) --#(2 P): : How do you define an important variable? I see variable importance as a varying aspect, not absolute and often case-specific. --Anna Karjalainen 14:17, 7 May 2008 (EEST) |
A tentative structure for the result database
Old, poor idea: Each variable is a table; each row has a fixed number of rows that equal to iterations (random samples); each row in the index (using Analytica terminology) is a column in the table.
New, better idea was moved to Help:Variable. The structural suggestion was moved to Help:Result database.
