Talk:Opasnet base structure

From Testiwiki
Revision as of 09:39, 7 January 2008 by Jouni (talk | contribs) (-- ~~~~)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search

-- Jouni 11:39, 7 January 2008 (EET)

Should all variables go to result distribution database?

How to read discussions

Statements:

Resolution: Resolution not yet found.

(A stable resolution, when found, should be updated to the main page.)

Argumentation:

#(number): : There should be two levels of variables: 1) The results of important variables are uploaded in the result database, and they should be coherent with each other. 2) Other variables that are less important are used in case-specific assessments. They don't need to be coherent with all variables in the result database, only with those within the same assessment. --Jouni 23:52, 20 August 2007 (EEST)


A tentative structure for the result database

Old, poor idea: Each variable is a table; each row has a fixed number of rows that equal to iterations (random samples); each row in the index (using Analytica terminology) is a column in the table.

New, better idea was moved to Help:Variable. The structural suggestion was moved to Help:Result database.