Difference between revisions of "Talk:Open assessment method"

From Testiwiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(resolution)
m (Talk:Open assessment moved to Talk:Open assessment method: The page is a method page and this should be seen. There is a need for an encyclopedia article about open assessment as well.)
(No difference)

Revision as of 21:36, 6 March 2009

How to read discussions

Statements:

Resolution: Resolution not yet found.

(A stable resolution, when found, should be updated to the main page.)

Argumentation:

#1: : We should rename Open Risk Assessment into Open Assessment as it has a wider field of application than just Risk Assessment. --Alexandra Kuhn 17:06, 6 March 2008 (EET), --Jouni 00:59, 8 March 2008 (EET)

#2: OA does not refer to environmental health impact assessment (what heande is about). It can therefore refer to an assessment of any issue what so ever (e.g. impacts of acid fall-out on lichen growth). But yes, it is however reasonable to seek for a wider field of application. Something similar as EIA (environmental impact assessment) should be chosen. How about OHIA? --Anna Karjalainen 11.45, 7 May 2008

#3: : Methodologically, there is no need to distinguish environmental health issues from others. Therefore, open assessment is the right word for the method and its products. --Jouni 11:27, 12 June 2008 (EEST)