Difference between revisions of "Talk:Open assessment method"
From Testiwiki
m (Talk:Open assessment moved to Talk:Open assessment method: The page is a method page and this should be seen. There is a need for an encyclopedia article about open assessment as well.) |
(Parameters corrected) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{discussion | {{discussion | ||
| − | | | + | |Statements= Rename open risk assessment into open assessment. |
| − | | | + | |Resolution= Accepted. |
|Argumentation = | |Argumentation = | ||
| − | {{defend| | + | {{defend|1|We should rename Open Risk Assessment into Open Assessment as it has a wider field of application than just Risk Assessment.|--[[User:Alexandra Kuhn|Alexandra Kuhn]] 17:06, 6 March 2008 (EET), --[[User:Jouni|Jouni]] 00:59, 8 March 2008 (EET)}} |
| − | {{attack_invalid| | + | {{attack_invalid|2|OA does not refer to environmental health impact assessment (what heande is about). It can therefore refer to an assessment of any issue what so ever (e.g. impacts of acid fall-out on lichen growth). But yes, it is however reasonable to seek for a wider field of application. Something similar as EIA (environmental impact assessment) should be chosen. How about OHIA?|--[[User:Anna Karjalainen|Anna Karjalainen]] 11.45, 7 May 2008}} |
| − | :{{attack| | + | :{{attack|3|Methodologically, there is no need to distinguish environmental health issues from others. Therefore, open assessment is the right word for the method and its products.|--[[User:Jouni|Jouni]] 11:27, 12 June 2008 (EEST)}} |
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 12:11, 16 November 2009
| Statements: Rename open risk assessment into open assessment.
Resolution: Accepted. (A stable resolution, when found, should be updated to the main page.) |
| Argumentation:
←1: We should rename Open Risk Assessment into Open Assessment as it has a wider field of application than just Risk Assessment. --Alexandra Kuhn 17:06, 6 March 2008 (EET), --Jouni 00:59, 8 March 2008 (EET) ⇤2 OA does not refer to environmental health impact assessment (what heande is about). It can therefore refer to an assessment of any issue what so ever (e.g. impacts of acid fall-out on lichen growth). But yes, it is however reasonable to seek for a wider field of application. Something similar as EIA (environmental impact assessment) should be chosen. How about OHIA? --Anna Karjalainen 11.45, 7 May 2008
|
