Difference between revisions of "Talk:PM2.5 emissions in Hämeenkyrö"
(moved from Talk:Hämeenkyrö MSWI risk assessment: Fine particles) |
m (Heta moved page Variable Talk:PM2.5 emissions in Hämeenkyrö to Talk:PM2.5 emissions in Hämeenkyrö: namespace closed) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
====PM<sub>2.5</sub> emissions in Hämeenkyrö==== | ====PM<sub>2.5</sub> emissions in Hämeenkyrö==== | ||
| − | {{ | + | {{Discussion |
| − | | | + | |Statements = Emissions should be given per sector |
| − | + | |Resolution = Accepted | |
| − | | | ||
|Argumentation = {{Defend|1|It is important to be able to compare different risks. Seeing emission values for each sector makes this easier. The new emissions from the plants can then be put into perspective with variables people can perceive: they may have previous experience or a feeling about the amount of smoke coming from homes, or factories.|--[[User:Jouni|Jouni]] 06:05, 22 September 2006 (EEST)--[[User:Päivi Roivainen|Päivi Roivainen]] 09:59, 22 September 2006 (EEST) | |Argumentation = {{Defend|1|It is important to be able to compare different risks. Seeing emission values for each sector makes this easier. The new emissions from the plants can then be put into perspective with variables people can perceive: they may have previous experience or a feeling about the amount of smoke coming from homes, or factories.|--[[User:Jouni|Jouni]] 06:05, 22 September 2006 (EEST)--[[User:Päivi Roivainen|Päivi Roivainen]] 09:59, 22 September 2006 (EEST) | ||
}} | }} | ||
| Line 11: | Line 10: | ||
| − | {{ | + | {{Discussion |
| − | | | + | |Statements = Well-being of local population is not an input to this variable |
| − | + | |Resolution = Accepted | |
| − | | | ||
|Argumentation = {{Defend|2|The whole emissions variable, and the PM<sub>2.5</sub> emissions in Hämeenkyrö as its subvariable, is an input to the well-being of local population variable, not vice versa| [[User:Mikko Pohjola|Mikko Pohjola]] 11:05, 26 September 2006 (EEST) | |Argumentation = {{Defend|2|The whole emissions variable, and the PM<sub>2.5</sub> emissions in Hämeenkyrö as its subvariable, is an input to the well-being of local population variable, not vice versa| [[User:Mikko Pohjola|Mikko Pohjola]] 11:05, 26 September 2006 (EEST) | ||
}} | }} | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 07:05, 22 August 2014
PM2.5 emissions in Hämeenkyrö
| Statements: Emissions should be given per sector
Resolution: Accepted (A stable resolution, when found, should be updated to the main page.) |
| Argumentation:
←1: It is important to be able to compare different risks. Seeing emission values for each sector makes this easier. The new emissions from the plants can then be put into perspective with variables people can perceive: they may have previous experience or a feeling about the amount of smoke coming from homes, or factories. --Jouni 06:05, 22 September 2006 (EEST)--Päivi Roivainen 09:59, 22 September 2006 (EEST) |
| Statements: Well-being of local population is not an input to this variable
Resolution: Accepted (A stable resolution, when found, should be updated to the main page.) |
| Argumentation:
←2: The whole emissions variable, and the PM2.5 emissions in Hämeenkyrö as its subvariable, is an input to the well-being of local population variable, not vice versa Mikko Pohjola 11:05, 26 September 2006 (EEST) |
