Difference between revisions of "Talk:PM2.5 exposure due to MSWI in Hämeenkyrö"
From Testiwiki
(dispute moved from main page to here) |
m (Heta moved page Variable Talk:PM2.5 exposure due to MSWI in Hämeenkyrö to Talk:PM2.5 exposure due to MSWI in Hämeenkyrö: namespace closed) |
||
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Which dose metric should be used?== | ==Which dose metric should be used?== | ||
− | {{ | + | {{Discussion |
− | | | + | |Statements = Which dose metric should be used? |
* A) Dose in units mg/kg/d (result 0.0008 mg/kg/d (based on formula)) | * A) Dose in units mg/kg/d (result 0.0008 mg/kg/d (based on formula)) | ||
* B) Exposure concentration in units µg/m<sup>3</sup> (0.02 µg/m3 (based on data)) | * B) Exposure concentration in units µg/m<sup>3</sup> (0.02 µg/m3 (based on data)) | ||
− | | | + | |Resolution= Exposure concentration in units µg/m<sup>3</sup> |
|Argumentation = | |Argumentation = | ||
− | {{defend| | + | {{defend|1|All exposure-response functions are using exposure concentration as the metric. Therefore B) should be used instead of dose. |--[[User:Jouni|Jouni]] 21:58, 27 March 2007 (EEST)}} |
}} | }} |
Latest revision as of 07:16, 22 August 2014
Which dose metric should be used?
Statements: Which dose metric should be used?
Resolution: Exposure concentration in units µg/m3 (A stable resolution, when found, should be updated to the main page.) |
Argumentation:
←1: All exposure-response functions are using exposure concentration as the metric. Therefore B) should be used instead of dose. --Jouni 21:58, 27 March 2007 (EEST) |