Difference between revisions of "Talk:Population of Helsinki metropolitan area"
Eva Kunseler (talk | contribs) |
(→Validity of Projections) |
||
(9 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown) | |||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
{{discussion | {{discussion | ||
− | | | + | |Statements= Administrative boundaries should define study area |
− | | | + | |Resolution= |
− | |Argumentation = {{defend|1 | + | |Argumentation = |
+ | {{defend|1|[[Assessment on impacts of emission trading on city-level (ET-CL) | Assessment]] includes only the Helsinki Met Area, and these boundaries should be used to 'clip' higher resolution population data (e.g. EEA grid) if used|--[[User:Dvienneau|Dvienneau]] 14:57, 17 February 2009 (EET)}} | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{defend|2|The adminstrative boundaries define the study area indeed. The population data could be organised in different grids, because this provides more detailed information|--[[User:Eva Kunseler|Eva Kunseler]] 15:08, 18 February 2009 (EET)}} | ||
}} | }} | ||
− | |||
== Source of data == | == Source of data == | ||
{{discussion | {{discussion | ||
− | | | + | |Statements= The source of data should not be defined as a boundary |
− | | | + | |Resolution= Accepted! |
− | |Argumentation = {{defend|#: |There could be other sources of data that can be used to define this variable|--[[User:Eva Kunseler|Eva Kunseler]] 15:31, 18 February 2009 (EET)}}}} | + | |Argumentation = {{defend|#: |There could be other sources of data that can be used to define this variable|--[[User:Eva Kunseler|Eva Kunseler]] 15:31, 18 February 2009 (EET)--[[User:Dvienneau|Dvienneau]] 15:42, 18 February 2009 (EET)}}}} |
− | == Validity of Statistics FI population projections == | + | == Validity of Projections == |
+ | {{discussion | ||
+ | |Statements= Validity of Statistics FI population projections | ||
+ | |Resolution= | ||
+ | |Argumentation = | ||
+ | {{defend|1|How can we assess the validity of these projections? Can we assign errors/confidence intervals to these projections? |--[[User:Dvienneau|Dvienneau]] 14:06, 18 February 2009 (EET)}} | ||
− | {{ | + | {{defend|2|How sensitive are [[ Assessment on impacts of emission trading on city-level (ET-CL) ]] assessment results to uncertainty in the population projections |--[[User:Dvienneau|Dvienneau]] 14:06, 18 February 2009 (EET)}} |
− | |||
− | + | :{{defend|3|You might want to contact Statistics Finland to have them explain how they derive these numbers and formulate your uncertainty interval |--[[User:Eva Kunseler|Eva Kunseler]]}} | |
− | + | {{attack|4|Enter your attacking argumentation between these two bars|--[[User:Jouni|Jouni]] 12:56, 4 June 2009 (EEST)}} | |
− | You might want to contact Statistics Finland to have them explain how they derive these numbers and formulate your uncertainty interval | + | }} |
Latest revision as of 13:29, 16 November 2009
Geographic Extent
Statements: Administrative boundaries should define study area
Resolution: Resolution not yet found. (A stable resolution, when found, should be updated to the main page.) |
Argumentation:
←1: Assessment includes only the Helsinki Met Area, and these boundaries should be used to 'clip' higher resolution population data (e.g. EEA grid) if used --Dvienneau 14:57, 17 February 2009 (EET) ←2: The adminstrative boundaries define the study area indeed. The population data could be organised in different grids, because this provides more detailed information --Eva Kunseler 15:08, 18 February 2009 (EET) |
Source of data
Statements: The source of data should not be defined as a boundary
Resolution: Accepted! (A stable resolution, when found, should be updated to the main page.) |
Argumentation:
←#: : There could be other sources of data that can be used to define this variable --Eva Kunseler 15:31, 18 February 2009 (EET)--Dvienneau 15:42, 18 February 2009 (EET) |
Validity of Projections
Statements: Validity of Statistics FI population projections
Resolution: Resolution not yet found. (A stable resolution, when found, should be updated to the main page.) |
Argumentation:
←1: How can we assess the validity of these projections? Can we assign errors/confidence intervals to these projections? --Dvienneau 14:06, 18 February 2009 (EET) ←2: How sensitive are Assessment on impacts of emission trading on city-level (ET-CL) assessment results to uncertainty in the population projections --Dvienneau 14:06, 18 February 2009 (EET)
⇤4: Enter your attacking argumentation between these two bars --Jouni 12:56, 4 June 2009 (EEST) |