Difference between revisions of "Talk:Population of Helsinki metropolitan area"

From Testiwiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(→‎Geographic Extent)
(→‎Validity of Projections)
 
(8 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
  
 
{{discussion
 
{{discussion
−
|Dispute= Administrative boundaries should define study area
+
|Statements= Administrative boundaries should define study area
−
|Outcome= Under discussion (to be changed when a conclusion is found)
+
|Resolution=  
−
|Argumentation = {{defend|1: |[[Assessment on impacts of emission trading on city-level (ET-CL) | Assessment]] includes only the Helsinki Met Area, and these boundaries should be used to 'clip' higher resolution population data (e.g. EEA grid) if used|--[[User:Dvienneau|Dvienneau]] 14:57, 17 February 2009 (EET)}}
+
|Argumentation =  
 +
{{defend|1|[[Assessment on impacts of emission trading on city-level (ET-CL) | Assessment]] includes only the Helsinki Met Area, and these boundaries should be used to 'clip' higher resolution population data (e.g. EEA grid) if used|--[[User:Dvienneau|Dvienneau]] 14:57, 17 February 2009 (EET)}}
  
−
{{defend|#: |The adminstrative boundaries define the study area indeed. The population data could be organised in different grids, because this provides more detailed information|--[[User:Eva Kunseler|Eva Kunseler]] 15:08, 18 February 2009 (EET)}}
+
{{defend|2|The adminstrative boundaries define the study area indeed. The population data could be organised in different grids, because this provides more detailed information|--[[User:Eva Kunseler|Eva Kunseler]] 15:08, 18 February 2009 (EET)}}
 
}}
 
}}
  
Line 12: Line 13:
  
 
{{discussion
 
{{discussion
−
|Dispute= The source of data should not be defined as a boundary
+
|Statements= The source of data should not be defined as a boundary
−
|Outcome= Under discussion (to be changed when a conclusion is found)
+
|Resolution= Accepted!
−
|Argumentation = {{defend|#: |There could be other sources of data that can be used to define this variable|--[[User:Eva Kunseler|Eva Kunseler]] 15:31, 18 February 2009 (EET)}}}}
+
|Argumentation = {{defend|#: |There could be other sources of data that can be used to define this variable|--[[User:Eva Kunseler|Eva Kunseler]] 15:31, 18 February 2009 (EET)--[[User:Dvienneau|Dvienneau]] 15:42, 18 February 2009 (EET)}}}}
  
−
== Validity of Statistics FI population projections ==
+
== Validity of Projections ==
 +
{{discussion
 +
|Statements= Validity of Statistics FI population projections
 +
|Resolution=  
 +
|Argumentation =
 +
{{defend|1|How can we assess the validity of these projections?  Can we assign errors/confidence intervals to these projections?  |--[[User:Dvienneau|Dvienneau]] 14:06, 18 February 2009 (EET)}}
  
−
{{attack|1: |How can we assess the validity of these projections?  Can we assign errors/confidence intervals to these projections?  |--[[User:Dvienneau|Dvienneau]] 14:06, 18 February 2009 (EET)}}
+
{{defend|2|How sensitive are [[ Assessment on impacts of emission trading on city-level (ET-CL) ]] assessment results to uncertainty in the population projections |--[[User:Dvienneau|Dvienneau]] 14:06, 18 February 2009 (EET)}}
−
{{attack|2: |How sensitive are [[ Assessment on impacts of emission trading on city-level (ET-CL) ]] assessment results to uncertainty in the population projections |--[[User:Dvienneau|Dvienneau]] 14:06, 18 February 2009 (EET)}}
 
  
−
===Re: Validity of Statistics FI population projections===
+
:{{defend|3|You might want to contact Statistics Finland to have them explain how they derive these numbers and formulate your uncertainty interval |--[[User:Eva Kunseler|Eva Kunseler]]}}
−
 
+
{{attack|4|Enter your attacking argumentation between these two bars|--[[User:Jouni|Jouni]] 12:56, 4 June 2009 (EEST)}}
−
You might want to contact Statistics Finland to have them explain how they derive these numbers and formulate your uncertainty interval
+
}}

Latest revision as of 13:29, 16 November 2009

Geographic Extent

How to read discussions

Statements: Administrative boundaries should define study area

Resolution: Resolution not yet found.

(A stable resolution, when found, should be updated to the main page.)

Argumentation:

←1: Assessment includes only the Helsinki Met Area, and these boundaries should be used to 'clip' higher resolution population data (e.g. EEA grid) if used --Dvienneau 14:57, 17 February 2009 (EET)

←2: The adminstrative boundaries define the study area indeed. The population data could be organised in different grids, because this provides more detailed information --Eva Kunseler 15:08, 18 February 2009 (EET)


Source of data

How to read discussions

Statements: The source of data should not be defined as a boundary

Resolution: Accepted!

(A stable resolution, when found, should be updated to the main page.)

Argumentation:

←#: : There could be other sources of data that can be used to define this variable --Eva Kunseler 15:31, 18 February 2009 (EET)--Dvienneau 15:42, 18 February 2009 (EET)


Validity of Projections

How to read discussions

Statements: Validity of Statistics FI population projections

Resolution: Resolution not yet found.

(A stable resolution, when found, should be updated to the main page.)

Argumentation:

←1: How can we assess the validity of these projections? Can we assign errors/confidence intervals to these projections? --Dvienneau 14:06, 18 February 2009 (EET)

←2: How sensitive are Assessment on impacts of emission trading on city-level (ET-CL) assessment results to uncertainty in the population projections --Dvienneau 14:06, 18 February 2009 (EET)

←3: You might want to contact Statistics Finland to have them explain how they derive these numbers and formulate your uncertainty interval --Eva Kunseler

⇤4: Enter your attacking argumentation between these two bars --Jouni 12:56, 4 June 2009 (EEST)

Retrieved from "http://www.opasnet.org/testiwiki/index.php?title=Talk:Population_of_Helsinki_metropolitan_area&oldid=11856"