Difference between revisions of "Talk:RM analysis Anna Kokkonen"
(Exercise evaluation) |
m (→Exercise evaluation) |
||
Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
Score: 3/4 | Score: 3/4 | ||
− | '''Summarizing''' | + | '''Summarizing''' |
* wrapping-up of the individual evaluations and tying them into the context described in the exercise description | * wrapping-up of the individual evaluations and tying them into the context described in the exercise description | ||
Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
Score: 2/2 | Score: 2/2 | ||
− | '''Bonus points''' | + | '''Bonus points''' |
* e.g. value adding extra work done | * e.g. value adding extra work done | ||
'''Total Score: 9/10 | '''Total Score: 9/10 |
Latest revision as of 07:08, 25 May 2011
Exercise evaluation
Analysis vs. object of analysis
* ability to differentiate between the analysis (knowledge creating process of studying real-world phenomena) and the phenomena that the analysis looks into
←1: Focus of evaluation is on the analysis and the knowledge it creates/is intended to create. --Mikko Pohjola 09:28, 25 May 2011 (EEST)
Score: 2/2
Analysis-use relationship
* ability to consider the possible meaning/value of the knowledge intended to be created by the planned analysis in different uses by different users
←2: The evaluation grasps well how the planned analysis and its results show in different light depending on different use/user perspective. --Mikko Pohjola 09:28, 25 May 2011 (EEST)
Score: 2/2
Usability of evaluation
* identification of major strengths as well as possible points of improvement * critical and constructive remarks to help develop the analysis (plan) further
←3: Major strengths identified. Some points of improvement identified. Some good remarks guiding further improvement. --Mikko Pohjola 09:28, 25 May 2011 (EEST)
⇤4: Perhaps a bit too "kind" evaluation. Some more constructive criticism would be helpful for those who further develop or apply the analysis plan. --Mikko Pohjola 09:28, 25 May 2011 (EEST)
Score: 3/4
Summarizing
* wrapping-up of the individual evaluations and tying them into the context described in the exercise description
←5: Good concise wrap-up and tying into the given context. --Mikko Pohjola 09:28, 25 May 2011 (EEST)
Score: 2/2
Bonus points
* e.g. value adding extra work done
Total Score: 9/10