Difference between revisions of "Talk:Wikimania 2009 poster abstract: Opasnet - a wiki site for improving societal decision-making"
From Testiwiki
Juha Villman (talk | contribs) (→Opasnet as a systematic science-policy interface) |
m |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
|Argumentation = | |Argumentation = | ||
{{defend|#1: |One of the driving forces, if not the main force, behind Opasnet development is the need to enable more systematic analysis of impacts of societal decisions, and thereby develop a better functioning science-policy interface that is (at minimum can be) policy prescriptive according to the state-of-the-art scientific understanding about societally important issues. Only bringing up the interaction with ''public audience'' undermines this important, and scientifically interesting, aspect of Opasnet|--[[User:Mikko Pohjola|Mikko Pohjola]] 21:27, 28 April 2009 (EEST)}} | {{defend|#1: |One of the driving forces, if not the main force, behind Opasnet development is the need to enable more systematic analysis of impacts of societal decisions, and thereby develop a better functioning science-policy interface that is (at minimum can be) policy prescriptive according to the state-of-the-art scientific understanding about societally important issues. Only bringing up the interaction with ''public audience'' undermines this important, and scientifically interesting, aspect of Opasnet|--[[User:Mikko Pohjola|Mikko Pohjola]] 21:27, 28 April 2009 (EEST)}} | ||
| − | {{attack|#2: |If interpreted broadly, societal decision makers belong to '' public audience''. Furthermore, the societal decision makers are representatives of the citizens (public audience being interpreted as somewhat equivalent to lay people here) and the informed, aware and determined public audience is what makes the decision makers move. Thereby, ''public audience'' holds it place as the main target of Opasnet.|--[[User:Mikko Pohjola|Mikko Pohjola]] 21:27, 28 April 2009 (EEST)}} | + | |
| + | :{{attack|#2: |If interpreted broadly, societal decision makers belong to '' public audience''. Furthermore, the societal decision makers are representatives of the citizens (public audience being interpreted as somewhat equivalent to lay people here) and the informed, aware and determined public audience is what makes the decision makers move. Thereby, ''public audience'' holds it place as the main target of Opasnet.|--[[User:Mikko Pohjola|Mikko Pohjola]] 21:27, 28 April 2009 (EEST)}} | ||
{{defend|#3: |Yes, concept of public audience is not expressed clear enough. Actually it should cover at least scientists, policy-makers and public audience.|--[[User:Juha Villman|Juha Villman]] 08:22, 29 April 2009 (EEST)}} | {{defend|#3: |Yes, concept of public audience is not expressed clear enough. Actually it should cover at least scientists, policy-makers and public audience.|--[[User:Juha Villman|Juha Villman]] 08:22, 29 April 2009 (EEST)}} | ||
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 18:39, 14 February 2010
Opasnet as a systematic science-policy interface
| Statements: Systematic policy guidance is a necessary aspect of Opasnet and deserves being explicitly mentioned alongside, or instead of, interaction with public audience.
Resolution: Under discussion (to be changed when a conclusion is found) (A stable resolution, when found, should be updated to the main page.) |
| Argumentation:
←#1: : One of the driving forces, if not the main force, behind Opasnet development is the need to enable more systematic analysis of impacts of societal decisions, and thereby develop a better functioning science-policy interface that is (at minimum can be) policy prescriptive according to the state-of-the-art scientific understanding about societally important issues. Only bringing up the interaction with public audience undermines this important, and scientifically interesting, aspect of Opasnet --Mikko Pohjola 21:27, 28 April 2009 (EEST)
←#3: : Yes, concept of public audience is not expressed clear enough. Actually it should cover at least scientists, policy-makers and public audience. --Juha Villman 08:22, 29 April 2009 (EEST) |
