Difference between revisions of "User:Juho Kutvonen"

Revision as of 09:21, 23 January 2013

Homework 1

1.What is the main purpose of environmental health assessment? The main purpose of environmental health assessment is to assess and control environmental factors which can cause adverse health effects. In other words, its purpose is to ensure that people live in health-supporting environment.

6. What is benefit-risk assessment? Benefit-risk assessment is a certain kind of assessment type in which pros (benefits) and cons (risks) of a phenomenon are weighed. For example, fish contains valuable nutrients(vitamin D, soft fats) but as well it often contains environmental pollutants such as PCB compounds. In benefit-risk assessment it is weighed if the benefits are bigger than the possible risk.

15. What is collaboration? Collaboration means working together in order to create something. In environmental health assessments collaboration between e.g. scientists and decision-makers is vital since without it it´s difficult to get desired results improving human health.

Homework 3.

Since I worked with Salla, our homework can be found from the link below.

http://en.opasnet.org/w/User:Salla

Homework 4.

• What are the aims/goals of the strategy/program, i.e. what are the desired impacts and outcomes striven for?

The aims of the strategy are: 1) to reduce reduce the per capita carbon dioxide emissions of the Helsinki Metropolitan Area by 39 per cent of the 1990 level by the year 2030, 2)to create a common vision and appreciation of operating policies to reduce greenhouse gas emissions in the Helsinki Metropolitan Area, 3) to ensure that greenhouse gas emission cuts become a consistent element in the objectives imposed by various city agencies for their own operations.

• Who are those that benefit if the aims/goals of the strategy/program are reached? How?

City residents since the air quality is better due to reduction private vehicles and due to increase of public transport (less pollutants in the air) Energy companies because consumers may appreciate energy companies which consider environmental values in energy production. People who use public transport since when public transport is trying to be made more popular, ticket prices will decline. Helsinki Region Transport because it will have more passengers due to ticket price reduction. Cyclists if bike roads are enhanced by land use.

• What are the actions that are needed/intended to take in order to progress towards the aims/goals?

Development of public transport by increasing frequency in bus turns, dropping ticket prices and ensuring rapid connections. This is because public transport produces less CO2 emissions than private motoring. Land use: bikeroad network is enhanced by planning. Reduction of energy consumption by economical incentatives. Enhancements in energy production: 1)energy efficiency can be improved by increasing the efficiency of energy generating, reducing transmission losses and utilising district heating losses return flows more effectively. 2) increase of renewable energy sources in energy production. Influencing national and international policy making Establishing collaborative practices between various administrative branches to reduce to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, and improving co-operation between the city and the region.

• Who are those that actually realize these actions?

Helsinki city council (land use, zoning, influence to policy making, development of public transport). Helsingin Energia (choice of fuel in energy production). Helsinki Regional Transport(development of public transport).

• What are the decisions that are needed to make in order to enable/promote the actions?

• Who are the decision makers?

Helsinki city council Helsingin Energia Helsinki Regional Transport

• What direct or indirect health impacts, positive or negative, these decisions and actions (may) have?

Improvement of public transport decreases amount of air pollutants and since air is cleaner, morbidity is lesser. Increased use of biomass in energy production may slightly increase morbidity due to PM2.5 emissions. Due to enhanced bikeroad network people have a better possibility to do exercise and hence people feel better.

• Are the health impacts big or small in relation to other impacts (e.g. economical, social, climate, other environmental, ...)?

In our opinion the health impacts are quite small in relation to other impacts since for example slightly increased PM2.5 concentration due to biomass fuel does not cause significant impacts, in other words we consider for instance the economical effects greater than the health effects.

• Do the intended policies result in win-win, win-lose, lose-win, or lose-lose situations with regard to health and other impacts?

Development of public transport results in win-win situation because air quality is better due to lower emissions and bus company (Helsinki Regional Transport) benefits as well since more people travel by bus due to lower ticket prices. Use of biomass in energy production may on the other hand result in lose-win situation because morbidity may slightly increase due to PM 2.5 emissions but in the same time fewer CO2 emissions are produced in energy production.