Talk:RM analysis Carmen Gil

Exercise evaluation

Analysis vs. object of analysis

* ability to differentiate between the analysis (knowledge creating process of studying real-world phenomena) and the phenomena that the analysis looks into

←1: The focus of evaluation is on the analyses and the knowledge they are intended to create. --Mikko Pohjola 10:07, 25 May 2011 (EEST)

Score: 2/2

Analysis-use relationship

* ability to consider the possible meaning/value of the knowledge intended to be created by the planned analysis in different uses by different users

←2: The differing meaning/value in different uses considered. The linkage from knowledge to action well identified. --Mikko Pohjola 10:07, 25 May 2011 (EEST)

Score: 2/2

Usability of evaluation

* identification of major strengths as well as possible points of improvement
* critical and constructive remarks to help develop the analysis (plan) further

←3: Provides good advice on the strengths and applications of the planned analyses. --Mikko Pohjola 10:07, 25 May 2011 (EEST)

⇤4: Some more critical remarks on the points of improvement in different analyses would make the evaluation more valuable for those who intend to take the plans forward. --Mikko Pohjola 10:07, 25 May 2011 (EEST)

Score: 3/4

Summarizing

* wrapping-up of the individual evaluations and tying them into the context described in the exercise description

←5: Main points wrapped-up. The interrelations between different analyses well identified and the whole complex tied into the given context. --Mikko Pohjola 10:07, 25 May 2011 (EEST)

Score: 2/2

Bonus points

* e.g. value adding extra work done

←6: Nice attempt to compare the analysis evaluations attribute by attribute in tables. --Mikko Pohjola 10:07, 25 May 2011 (EEST)

Score: 1/2

Total Score: 10/10