Difference between revisions of "Talk:Mercury and methyl mercury concentrations in fish"
(moved from Beneris:Variable Talk:Concentrations of nutrients and pollutants in fish -- ~~~~) |
(Parameters corrected) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
{{discussion | {{discussion | ||
| − | | | + | |Statements= Variable should restrict to Finland. |
| − | | | + | |Resolution= Not accepted. |
|Argumentation = | |Argumentation = | ||
| − | {{attack| | + | {{attack|1|It is easier to compare results when they are in one place. In addition, often the fish don't follow national boundaries.|--[[User:Jouni|Jouni]] 11:23, 10 February 2008 (EET)}} |
}} | }} | ||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
{{discussion | {{discussion | ||
| − | | | + | |Statements= Enough number of samples?{{needs editing}} |
| − | | | + | |Resolution= |
|Argumentation = | |Argumentation = | ||
| − | {{attack| | + | {{attack|1|There are species with only two samples. Is this enough?|--[[User:Olli|Olli]] 15:22, 17 September 2007 (EEST)}} |
| − | :{{attack| | + | :{{attack|2|For the most consumed species (e.g. salmon and herring), there are at least eight samples, which should be enough.|--[[User:Olli|Olli]] 15:22, 17 September 2007 (EEST)}} |
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 13:10, 16 November 2009
moved from Beneris:Variable Talk:Concentrations of nutrients and pollutants in fish -- Jouni 11:23, 10 February 2008 (EET)
Should the variable restrict to Finland?
| Statements: Variable should restrict to Finland.
Resolution: Not accepted. (A stable resolution, when found, should be updated to the main page.) |
| Argumentation:
⇤1: It is easier to compare results when they are in one place. In addition, often the fish don't follow national boundaries. --Jouni 11:23, 10 February 2008 (EET) |
Number of samples
| Statements: Enough number of samples?Needs editing
Resolution: Resolution not yet found. (A stable resolution, when found, should be updated to the main page.) |
| Argumentation:
⇤1: There are species with only two samples. Is this enough? --Olli 15:22, 17 September 2007 (EEST)
|
| Statements:
Resolution: Resolution not yet found. (A stable resolution, when found, should be updated to the main page.) |
| Argumentation:
--#(number): : Justifiable procedure in author judgement would be to use name(s) of the author(s) used --> here e.g. (Leino O., 2007). Scientific information should always be citable. --Anna Karjalainen 16:51, 20 November 2007 (EET) |
| Statements:
Resolution: Resolution not yet found. (A stable resolution, when found, should be updated to the main page.) |
| Argumentation:
←#(number): : Explanation of the rationale about the chosen distribution is highly useful and justifiable. --Anna Karjalainen 17:17, 20 November 2007 (EET) |
