Difference between revisions of "Well-being"

From Testiwiki
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Well-being indices)
m (See also)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 16: Line 16:
 
* [http://www.soc.duke.edu/~cwi/sectiona.htm Child and Youth Well-Being Index]
 
* [http://www.soc.duke.edu/~cwi/sectiona.htm Child and Youth Well-Being Index]
 
* [[:en:Index of Sustainable Economic Welfare|Index of Sustainable Economic Welfare]] (ISEW)
 
* [[:en:Index of Sustainable Economic Welfare|Index of Sustainable Economic Welfare]] (ISEW)
 +
* [http://www.leefbaarometer.nl/ Wellbeing indicator from the Netherlands]
  
 
==See also==
 
==See also==
  
 +
* [http://www.terveytemme.fi/ath/tulokset/index.html Alueellinen terveys- ja hyvinvointitutkimus]
 
* [[:en:Quality of life|Quality of life]]
 
* [[:en:Quality of life|Quality of life]]
 
*  http://homepage.psy.utexas.edu/HomePage/Group/BussLAB/pdffiles/Evolution_Of_Happiness_2000.pdf
 
*  http://homepage.psy.utexas.edu/HomePage/Group/BussLAB/pdffiles/Evolution_Of_Happiness_2000.pdf

Latest revision as of 07:26, 23 April 2012


Well-being is most commonly used in philosophy to describe what is non-instrumentally or ultimately good for a person. The question of what well-being consists in is of independent interest, but it is of great importance in moral philosophy, especially in the case of utilitarianism, according to which well-being is to be maximized. Significant challenges to the very notion have been made, in particular by G.E. Moore and T.M. Scanlon. It has become standard to distinguish theories of well-being as either hedonist theories, desire theories, or objective list theories. According to the view known as welfarism, well-being is the only value. Also important in ethics is the question of how a person's moral character relates to their well-being.[1]

Well-being indices

See also

References

  1. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy [1]