Difference between revisions of "Domestic fish consumption of the pregnant women in Finland"
(technical edits and table 2 changed from kg/a to g/d like others) |
|||
(5 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | + | [[Category:Fish]] | |
+ | [[Category:Heavy metals]] | ||
+ | [[Category:Exposures]] | ||
+ | {{variable|moderator=Jouni}} | ||
− | == | + | ==Question== |
− | + | What is the fish consumption of the pregnant women in Finland? Exposure due to Finnish fish consumption only. Imported fish are not considered. {{disclink|Pregnant women only or all at childbearing age?}} {{disclink|Imported fish?}} | |
− | == | + | ==Answer== |
− | + | '''Data 1''' | |
− | + | {| {{prettytable}} | |
+ | |+ '''Fish consumption among fish users according to Tero Hirvonen, 2007 (g/d). | ||
+ | ! Fish species || Consumption | ||
+ | |---- | ||
+ | || Baltic herring (Clupea harengus membras) || 3.539 | ||
+ | |---- | ||
+ | || Herring (Clupea harengus) || 0.0988 | ||
+ | |---- | ||
+ | || Vendace (Coregonus albula) || 0.9498 | ||
+ | |---- | ||
+ | || Whitefish (Coregonus lavaretus) || 5.589 | ||
+ | |---- | ||
+ | || Pike (Esox lucius) || 1.526 | ||
+ | |---- | ||
+ | || Rainbow trout (Onchorhynchus mykiss) || 8.691 | ||
+ | |---- | ||
+ | || Shrimp (Pandalus sp.) || 2.31 | ||
+ | |---- | ||
+ | || Perch (Perca fluviatilis) || 0.5699 | ||
+ | |---- | ||
+ | || Saithe (Pollachius virens) || 7.822 | ||
+ | |---- | ||
+ | || Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) || 1.636 | ||
+ | |---- | ||
+ | || Pike-perch (Sander lucioperca) || 0 | ||
+ | |---- | ||
+ | || Tuna (Thunnus thynnus) || 6.192 | ||
+ | |---- | ||
+ | |} | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
'''Data 2''' | '''Data 2''' | ||
− | + | {| {{prettytable}} | |
+ | |+ '''Fish consumption according to Leino et al., 2007 (g/d). | ||
+ | ! Fish species || High consumption || Median consumption || Low consumption | ||
+ | |---- | ||
+ | || Farmed salmon (sea+inland) || 13.92|| 3.61|| 0.32 | ||
+ | |---- | ||
+ | || Wild salmon || 0.82|| 0.21|| 0.02 | ||
+ | |---- | ||
+ | || Herring(sea) || 0.34|| 0.04|| 0.04 | ||
+ | |---- | ||
+ | || White fish(sea) || 5.3|| 1.24|| 1.24 | ||
+ | |---- | ||
+ | || Sprat(sea) || 0|| 0|| 0 | ||
+ | |---- | ||
+ | || Perch(sea) || 0.6|| 0.02|| 0.01 | ||
+ | |---- | ||
+ | || Flounder(sea) || 0|| 0|| 0 | ||
+ | |---- | ||
+ | || Pike-perch(sea) || 0|| 0|| 0 | ||
+ | |---- | ||
+ | || Bream(sea) || 0|| 0|| 0 | ||
+ | |---- | ||
+ | || Pike(sea) || 1.38|| 0.02|| 0.01 | ||
+ | |---- | ||
+ | || Vendace(sea) || 0.14|| 0.01|| 0 | ||
+ | |---- | ||
+ | || Burbot(sea) || 0|| 0|| 0 | ||
+ | |---- | ||
+ | || Wild salmon(inland) || 1.65|| 0.43|| 0.04 | ||
+ | |---- | ||
+ | || White fish(inland) || 8.41|| 1.96|| 1.96 | ||
+ | |---- | ||
+ | || Perch(inland) || 1.68|| 0.07|| 0.03 | ||
+ | |---- | ||
+ | || Pike-perch(inland) || 0|| 0|| 0 | ||
+ | |---- | ||
+ | || Bream(inland) || 0|| 0|| 0 | ||
+ | |---- | ||
+ | || Pike(inland) || 6.04|| 0.07|| 0.04 | ||
+ | |---- | ||
+ | || Vendace(inland) || 3.46|| 0.18|| 0.04 | ||
+ | |---- | ||
+ | || Burbot(inland) || 0|| 0|| 0 | ||
+ | |---- | ||
+ | |} | ||
− | |||
− | + | '''Data 3''' | |
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | + | {| {{prettytable}} | |
+ | |+ '''Fish consumption (g/d). | ||
+ | ! Fish Species|| Mean consumption | ||
+ | |---- | ||
+ | || BS Herring|| 2.06 | ||
+ | |---- | ||
+ | || Vendace(inland)|| 0.51 | ||
+ | |---- | ||
+ | || Vendace(sea)|| 0.02 | ||
+ | |---- | ||
+ | || Whitefish(inland)|| 0.84 | ||
+ | |---- | ||
+ | || Whitefish(sea)|| 0.54 | ||
+ | |---- | ||
+ | || Pike(inland)|| 0.8 | ||
+ | |---- | ||
+ | || Pike(sea)|| 0.19 | ||
+ | |---- | ||
+ | || Perch(inland)|| 0.27 | ||
+ | |---- | ||
+ | || Perch(sea)|| 0.09 | ||
+ | |---- | ||
+ | || Atlantic Salmon|| 1.11 | ||
+ | |---- | ||
+ | || Pike-perch(inland)|| 0 | ||
+ | |---- | ||
+ | || Pike-Perch(sea)|| 0 | ||
+ | |---- | ||
+ | |} | ||
− | == | + | ==Rationale== |
'''Data 1''' | '''Data 1''' | ||
− | + | Fish consumption by pregnant women <ref name="Tero">Tero Hirvonen. 2007. Beneris_Food consumption pregnant women_FINLAND_300507_th.xls</ref> for twelve various fish species commonly consumed in Finland as normal distributions (mean, SD). | |
'''Data 2''' | '''Data 2''' | ||
− | + | Domestic fish consumption of the pregnant women include fish consumption data <ref>Methyl mercury: BENERIS WP2 Database </ref> for twelve different species and demonstrate five fractiles (0.05, 0.25, 0.5, 0.75 and 0.95). There are several species with zero consumption. These values are replaced with a very low value 1u=10<sup>-6</sup> to avoid errors prompts in the further calculations of the model. In addition we use the estimated fish consumption of the general population <ref>Methyl mercury:Leino et al. 2007 submitted </ref>, as a reference. {{disclink|Women in childbearing age}} | |
+ | |||
+ | '''Data 3''' | ||
− | + | Consumption of sea and freshwater fish species by pregnant women was extracted from <ref name="Tero" /> where the summary statistics of intakes of twelve fish species by users only are given (mean, sd and percentiles: 5<sup>th</sup>,25<sup>th</sup>, 50<sup>th</sup>, 75<sup>th</sup>, 95<sup>th</sup>). The estimation process was basically broken down into three steps. In the first step fish intake distributions for fish users were determined based on data in <ref name="Tero" />. Here, for a given species the starting/initial cumulative distribution function (CDF) of intake was first constructed by linear interpolation between known percentiles. In general, this distribution will not reproduce the mean and SD as provided by the data. Therefore, the constrained optimization was further used to find the CDF that satisfies the percentiles given and whose mean and variance are as close as possible to the mean and variance from the data. In the second step the intake distributions for all pregnant women were determined. This was possible thanks to information about the percentage of pregnant women consuming particular fish species. Finally, species specific data on the sea and inland intake proportions (assumed to be the same as proportion of sea and inland fishery catch and extracted from <ref>RKTL,2006. Finnish Fisheries Statistics.</ref>) was used to estimate the intake of sea and freshwater fish species by all pregnant women. | |
− | g/d | + | === Unit === |
+ | |||
+ | g/d (in Data 1 in the subpopulation of fish users) | ||
=== Formula === | === Formula === | ||
Line 66: | Line 146: | ||
'''Data 1''' | '''Data 1''' | ||
− | + | <anacode>3.539 4.046 0.0988 0.1122 0.9498 1.512 5.589 5.162 1.526 3.585 8.691 9.747 2.31 1.904 0.5699 | |
+ | 1.161 7.822 6.761 1.636 1.713 0.000e+000 0.000e+000 6.192 7.883</anacode> | ||
'''Data 2''' | '''Data 2''' | ||
Line 72: | Line 153: | ||
Analytica_id: | Analytica_id: | ||
− | + | <anacode>Table(Quantile,Fish)( 3.538520795,0.0987977390000001,0.949758417,5.588543108,1.526348165,8.690571699, | |
− | + | 2.309576484,0.569864064,7.822047198,1.6355467,0,6.192115439, 4.046127233,0.112185126,1.512467425,5.161569621, | |
− | + | 3.585166761,9.746680784,1.904184514,1.161265955,6.76128292,1.712611279,0,7.882813666, 0.486401325,0.039995998, | |
− | + | 0.044445555,3.199680074,0.044445555,0.543945572,1.319868031,0.044445555,2.924507455,0.213311992,0,2.474752424, | |
− | + | 0.606605988,0.039995998,0.044445555,3.199680074,0.044445555,2.055794298,1.319868031,0.044445555,2.924507455, | |
− | + | 0.426623983,0,2.474752424, 1.945751342,0.039995998,0.190503825,3.199680074,0.0888911100000001,6.076351881,1.319868031, | |
− | + | 0.0888911100000001,5.849014909,1.133886573,0,4.949504848, 4.944405412,0.099995997,1.155451108,6.399360148,1.850337694, | |
− | + | 11.27679141,2.639736061,1.138019529,10.66421104,2.267773146,0,7.425000072, 10.52461027,0.342851994,3.601659561,13.7145601, | |
− | + | 7.420697623,23.43747716,5.657256199,2.276039057,18.40303739,5.073409465,0,21.21396707 )</anacode> | |
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | + | ==See also== | |
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | + | * [[Domestic fish consumption of the general population in Finland]] | |
== References == | == References == | ||
Line 282: | Line 171: | ||
<references /> | <references /> | ||
− | + | ==Related files== | |
+ | |||
+ | {{mfiles}} |
Latest revision as of 09:23, 3 January 2012
This page is a variable.
The page identifier is Op_en1835 |
---|
Moderator:Jouni (see all) |
Give your opinion to the peer rating of the content of this page. |
Upload data
|
Contents
Question
What is the fish consumption of the pregnant women in Finland? Exposure due to Finnish fish consumption only. Imported fish are not considered. D↷ D↷
Answer
Data 1
Fish species | Consumption |
---|---|
Baltic herring (Clupea harengus membras) | 3.539 |
Herring (Clupea harengus) | 0.0988 |
Vendace (Coregonus albula) | 0.9498 |
Whitefish (Coregonus lavaretus) | 5.589 |
Pike (Esox lucius) | 1.526 |
Rainbow trout (Onchorhynchus mykiss) | 8.691 |
Shrimp (Pandalus sp.) | 2.31 |
Perch (Perca fluviatilis) | 0.5699 |
Saithe (Pollachius virens) | 7.822 |
Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) | 1.636 |
Pike-perch (Sander lucioperca) | 0 |
Tuna (Thunnus thynnus) | 6.192 |
Data 2
Fish species | High consumption | Median consumption | Low consumption |
---|---|---|---|
Farmed salmon (sea+inland) | 13.92 | 3.61 | 0.32 |
Wild salmon | 0.82 | 0.21 | 0.02 |
Herring(sea) | 0.34 | 0.04 | 0.04 |
White fish(sea) | 5.3 | 1.24 | 1.24 |
Sprat(sea) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Perch(sea) | 0.6 | 0.02 | 0.01 |
Flounder(sea) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Pike-perch(sea) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Bream(sea) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Pike(sea) | 1.38 | 0.02 | 0.01 |
Vendace(sea) | 0.14 | 0.01 | 0 |
Burbot(sea) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Wild salmon(inland) | 1.65 | 0.43 | 0.04 |
White fish(inland) | 8.41 | 1.96 | 1.96 |
Perch(inland) | 1.68 | 0.07 | 0.03 |
Pike-perch(inland) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Bream(inland) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Pike(inland) | 6.04 | 0.07 | 0.04 |
Vendace(inland) | 3.46 | 0.18 | 0.04 |
Burbot(inland) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Data 3
Fish Species | Mean consumption |
---|---|
BS Herring | 2.06 |
Vendace(inland) | 0.51 |
Vendace(sea) | 0.02 |
Whitefish(inland) | 0.84 |
Whitefish(sea) | 0.54 |
Pike(inland) | 0.8 |
Pike(sea) | 0.19 |
Perch(inland) | 0.27 |
Perch(sea) | 0.09 |
Atlantic Salmon | 1.11 |
Pike-perch(inland) | 0 |
Pike-Perch(sea) | 0 |
Rationale
Data 1
Fish consumption by pregnant women [1] for twelve various fish species commonly consumed in Finland as normal distributions (mean, SD).
Data 2
Domestic fish consumption of the pregnant women include fish consumption data [2] for twelve different species and demonstrate five fractiles (0.05, 0.25, 0.5, 0.75 and 0.95). There are several species with zero consumption. These values are replaced with a very low value 1u=10-6 to avoid errors prompts in the further calculations of the model. In addition we use the estimated fish consumption of the general population [3], as a reference. D↷
Data 3
Consumption of sea and freshwater fish species by pregnant women was extracted from [1] where the summary statistics of intakes of twelve fish species by users only are given (mean, sd and percentiles: 5th,25th, 50th, 75th, 95th). The estimation process was basically broken down into three steps. In the first step fish intake distributions for fish users were determined based on data in [1]. Here, for a given species the starting/initial cumulative distribution function (CDF) of intake was first constructed by linear interpolation between known percentiles. In general, this distribution will not reproduce the mean and SD as provided by the data. Therefore, the constrained optimization was further used to find the CDF that satisfies the percentiles given and whose mean and variance are as close as possible to the mean and variance from the data. In the second step the intake distributions for all pregnant women were determined. This was possible thanks to information about the percentage of pregnant women consuming particular fish species. Finally, species specific data on the sea and inland intake proportions (assumed to be the same as proportion of sea and inland fishery catch and extracted from [4]) was used to estimate the intake of sea and freshwater fish species by all pregnant women.
Unit
g/d (in Data 1 in the subpopulation of fish users)
Formula
Data 1
<anacode>3.539 4.046 0.0988 0.1122 0.9498 1.512 5.589 5.162 1.526 3.585 8.691 9.747 2.31 1.904 0.5699 1.161 7.822 6.761 1.636 1.713 0.000e+000 0.000e+000 6.192 7.883</anacode>
Data 2
Analytica_id:
<anacode>Table(Quantile,Fish)( 3.538520795,0.0987977390000001,0.949758417,5.588543108,1.526348165,8.690571699, 2.309576484,0.569864064,7.822047198,1.6355467,0,6.192115439, 4.046127233,0.112185126,1.512467425,5.161569621, 3.585166761,9.746680784,1.904184514,1.161265955,6.76128292,1.712611279,0,7.882813666, 0.486401325,0.039995998, 0.044445555,3.199680074,0.044445555,0.543945572,1.319868031,0.044445555,2.924507455,0.213311992,0,2.474752424, 0.606605988,0.039995998,0.044445555,3.199680074,0.044445555,2.055794298,1.319868031,0.044445555,2.924507455, 0.426623983,0,2.474752424, 1.945751342,0.039995998,0.190503825,3.199680074,0.0888911100000001,6.076351881,1.319868031, 0.0888911100000001,5.849014909,1.133886573,0,4.949504848, 4.944405412,0.099995997,1.155451108,6.399360148,1.850337694, 11.27679141,2.639736061,1.138019529,10.66421104,2.267773146,0,7.425000072, 10.52461027,0.342851994,3.601659561,13.7145601, 7.420697623,23.43747716,5.657256199,2.276039057,18.40303739,5.073409465,0,21.21396707 )</anacode>
See also
References
Related files
<mfanonymousfilelist></mfanonymousfilelist>