Difference between revisions of "Progression class"
From Testiwiki
(instructions copied from Template:Progression class) |
(No difference)
|
Latest revision as of 08:29, 9 April 2016
In Opasnet many pages being worked on and are in different classes of progression. Thus the information on those pages should be regarded with consideration. The progression class of this page has been assessed:
|
The content and quality of this page is being curated by THL. Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination
|
This page is a method.
The page identifier is Op_en7490 |
---|
Moderator:Jouni (see all) |
Give your opinion to the peer rating of the content of this page. |
Upload data
|
Contents
Question
How should the progress of an Opasnet page be evaluated in such a way that
- a user can evaluate the quality of content,
- a contributor gets instructions for improvement,
- the responsibilities of maintaining and improving the quality are clear?
Anwer
Template Progression class should be used for this purpose. It is placed on the top of a page, and the progress level and organisation that curates the page are given.
Parameters:
- progression: The following progression classes are used (see more detailed descriptions below):
- curator: Name of the institute that takes care of the page so that the quality improves and does not deteriorate. The name of the person curating the page is given as the moderator parameter in the page type template (assessment, method, ovariable etc).
- date: Date (in format 2016-03-21) when the whole page was lasted checked and, if needed, updated.
Levels of progress
- This page is a placeholder
- It contains only parts of the actual page and works mostly as a note that there is a plan to build this page.
- This page is a draft
- The relevat content and structure of the page is already present, but there still is a lot of missing content.
- This page is a full draft
- This page has been written through once, so all important content is already where it should be. However, the content has not been thoroughly checked yet, and for example important references might still be missing.
- This page is checked
- The content has been checked and the references are in place. An equivalent to a manuscript to be sent to a scientific journal.
- This page is reviewed
- It has been read with a critical eye and commented on by an outside source, and given impairment suggestions have been included in the page. An equivalent to a peer-reviewed article.
- This page is established
- It is equivalent to an article that has been referenced quite a lot and from which no relevant mistakes have been found.
Rationale
The template was developed in practical use during several iterations of alternative approaches.
See also
- Curating Opasnet pages
- Is there a page for moderating instructions?
- Category:Moderator pages
- Category:Curator