Search results

Create the page "Review" on this wiki! See also the search results found.

• Concentration-response to PM2.5
  ...Health aspects of air pollution. Results from the WHO project "Systematic review of health aspects of air pollution in Europe". World Health Organization, 2
  17 KB (2,640 words) - 07:36, 10 June 2015
• Evaluating performance of environmental health assessments
  In this paper we review different perspectives to evaluation and management of model and assessment ...s, and particularly the factors that determine how well they perform. This review is based on the extensive information and knowledge base on model and asses
  63 KB (8,880 words) - 16:20, 4 March 2015
• Health impact assessment
  This measure is especially useful to review the generic health state in a country for the long term, but it doesn’t g
  38 KB (5,242 words) - 10:18, 6 September 2017
• Heimtsa
  #Monetary valuation includes review of methods for valuating children’s health, developing values for relevan
  5 KB (724 words) - 14:13, 14 February 2011
• Publications of the risk research group, KTL (YTOS)
  Environ Health Perspect. 2001 Dec;109(12):1215-26. Review.
  13 KB (1,710 words) - 12:23, 3 October 2008
• Pyrkilo
  ...ment|'''Uncertainty and variability analysis''']] | [[Value of information review|Value of information analysis]] | [[:media:Detailedguidance.pdf|RIVM/MNP un :[[Health impact assessment|Health impact assessment (HIA)]] | [[Review of health impact issues]]
  65 KB (9,370 words) - 11:37, 20 November 2009
• Open participation
  ...policy making] by Ciaran O'Faircheallaigh. Environmental Impact Assessment Review (2009). {{doi|10.1016/j.eiar.2009.05.001}}
  4 KB (497 words) - 19:14, 4 February 2010
• Open assessment in research
  ...rom problems that are very difficult for us, c) we falsely think that peer review must always be done before the first publishing.
  12 KB (1,838 words) - 10:32, 22 July 2009
• Value of information
  ...F. and Thompson K.M. (2004a). Value of information literature analysis: A review of applications in health risk management. Medical Decision Making, 24 (3), This review will shortly consider different VOI methods, requirements of the analysis,
  32 KB (4,906 words) - 14:15, 13 October 2014
• Opasnet
  ...ected before you can contribute to a policy. You don't need to pass a peer review before you can contribute to science. You just find a proper page in [[Opas ...native to some, such as publishing peer-reviewed articles. "Publish first, review later" kind of wiki pages can live in harmony with traditional articles.
  18 KB (2,736 words) - 10:48, 27 August 2014
• Systems science
  .... Actual causes of death in the United States, 2000. JAMA;291(10):1238-45. Review. Erratum in: JAMA. 2005 Jan 19;293(3):293-4, 298.
  16 KB (2,341 words) - 14:23, 19 March 2009
• Air pollution emissions from ships in the northern Baltic Sea
  There is an excellent recent review of the topic for year 2000 emissions. <ref>Johanna Wahlström, Niko Karvose
  2 KB (173 words) - 11:38, 20 October 2008
• Respect currency
  * Peer review with a written evaluation and a quantitative estimate of onors can also be ...ly based on the onors that the model as a whole has received based on peer review, or the societal impact the topic has.
  12 KB (2,016 words) - 03:25, 2 April 2012
• Open assessment action plan
  ...essä hyödytöntä puuhaa, ellei tavoitteena ole julkaistu systemaattinen review. Niinpä
  19 KB (2,351 words) - 08:15, 2 January 2009
• Peer review
  | page = Peer review ...] for evaluating the scientific quality of a piece of information. In peer review a number of people that can be considered as reasonably acquainted with the
  8 KB (1,222 words) - 09:17, 14 June 2014
• Opastopia
  | [[Opasnet Journal]], [[Peer review]]
  15 KB (2,257 words) - 06:35, 13 April 2011
• Acknowledgements
  ...eading ''Acknowledgements''. Acknowledgements is closely related to [[peer review]] and [[peer rating]], which measure the respect (or merit) the page deserv
  4 KB (620 words) - 09:04, 22 March 2010
• Opasnet Journal
  ...n the [[Opasnet]] website. It is based on the principle '''"publish first, review later"''' in a similar way as [http://www.arxiv.org Arxiv] in physics. It p ...t been published in a peer-reviewed journal or series. The process of peer review is often lengthy, typically several months. In addition, the authors aim to
  5 KB (776 words) - 10:38, 19 May 2010
• Open assessment
  ...al analyses on original data, publishing original research results, [[peer review]], organising and distributing tasks within a group, or dissemination of re ...lowed to make '''[[peer review]]s''' of pages. These are similar to [[peer review]]s in scientific journals, with written evaluations of the scientific quali
  36 KB (5,339 words) - 09:03, 15 September 2015
• Open Task Group on Climate Change
  Review and collect the key models, and make them available for further use. This s
  6 KB (975 words) - 06:27, 21 December 2009

View (previous 20 | next 20) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)