Difference between revisions of "Congestion charge"

From Testiwiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Dependencies: causal diagram)
(updated)
Line 19: Line 19:
  
 
* Students on the course [[Decision analysis and risk management 2017]].
 
* Students on the course [[Decision analysis and risk management 2017]].
 +
* Participation happens on this page (including the related talk page) and also on [https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/0B5dY4ezoJ5FOWFdnT2NoS0tfa28 Google Drive], which contains three things:
 +
*# Real-time online editor for the three tables for [https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/10EuSt-YonlHQyNELCAftSiZ72jAsPKhw5q5MqQhbY10/edit Items, Relations, and Evaluations].
 +
*# Real-time online editor for the [https://docs.google.com/drawings/d/18PJNYL91_xAgygDKuITptISnUFMWh3K5SUtxqn0w0y0/edit causal diagram] below.
 +
*# Real-time online chat that happens on a [https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Jk3jK27MwHJesXMwdHwan9i5WwTF--hB4ekxwqau9U0/edit# Google Document].
  
 
=== Decisions and scenarios ===
 
=== Decisions and scenarios ===
Line 209: Line 213:
 
* Osmo Soininvaara: Why we should have congestion charge. 3.4.2017 [http://www.soininvaara.fi/2017/04/03/kaupunkirakentamisen-aika-35-ruuhkamaksut/]
 
* Osmo Soininvaara: Why we should have congestion charge. 3.4.2017 [http://www.soininvaara.fi/2017/04/03/kaupunkirakentamisen-aika-35-ruuhkamaksut/]
 
* Helsinki: Regional congestion charge would improve air quality in Helsinki. 3.5.2017 [http://www.hel.fi/www/uutiset/fi/ymparistokeskus/ruuhkamaksu-030517] [http://www.hel.fi/www/uutiset/fi/ymparistokeskus/ruuhkamaksu-030517?pd=v]
 
* Helsinki: Regional congestion charge would improve air quality in Helsinki. 3.5.2017 [http://www.hel.fi/www/uutiset/fi/ymparistokeskus/ruuhkamaksu-030517] [http://www.hel.fi/www/uutiset/fi/ymparistokeskus/ruuhkamaksu-030517?pd=v]
 +
'''Articles in Wikipedia
 +
* [[:en:Congestion pricing|Congestion pricing]]
 +
* [[:en:London congestion charge|London congestion charge]]
 +
* [[:fi:Ruuhkamaksu|Ruuhkamaksu]]
  
 +
{{hidden|
 +
1 =
 
== Add a discussion item, relation, or evaluation ==
 
== Add a discussion item, relation, or evaluation ==
  
{{hidden|
 
1 =
 
 
<rcode name="add" embed=1 label="Add a thing" showcode=-1 variables="
 
<rcode name="add" embed=1 label="Add a thing" showcode=-1 variables="
 
name:thing|description:What kind of thing are you adding?|type:selection|options:
 
name:thing|description:What kind of thing are you adding?|type:selection|options:

Revision as of 20:40, 14 May 2017



Question

What reasons are there for implementing or not implementing a congestion charging system in a city? What values and combinations of values result in which combination?

Boundaries

  • The questions are generic, but we aim to look at the issue also specifically in Helsinki.
  • We look at the current situation.

Intended use and users

  • --# : Who could use this information and how? Fill in your thoughts. --Jouni (talk) 11:36, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Participants

Decisions and scenarios

--# : What options do exist? Fill in your thoughts. --Jouni (talk) 11:36, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Timing

The assessment will be performed during April-May 2017.

Answer

Not found yet.

Rationale

Dependencies

Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination
The causal diagram is based on this Google drawing, which should be updated and uploaded to Opasnet from time to time.

These tables are being written to Google Sheet (for easier user interface) and copied here from time to time. See Google Sheets.

Items

Contents of Items table
Column Explanation
ID Unique identifier of the row.
Name A short descriptive name for this row. Used when making a reference to this row.
Timestamp Time when the row was added.
User Who added the row (first name)
Type It the item a factual statement (fact) or value statement (value); or decision, action or variable?
Description Verbal description of the content of the row.
Items(-)
ObsIDNameTimestampUserTypeDescription
1

Relations

Contents of Relations table
Column Explanation
ID Unique identifier of the row.
Name A short descriptive name for this row. Used when making a reference to this row.
Timestamp Time when the row was added.
User Who added the row (first name)
Subject Name or identifier of the thing we are talking about
Predicate Predicate of a sentence (i.e. a verb describing a relation). For list of relations, see Structure of shared understanding
Object Name or identifier of a thing, or number (see above)
Description Verbal description of the content of the row.
Relations(-)
ObsIDNameTimestampUserSubjectPredicateObjectDescription
1

Evaluations

Contents of Evaluations table
Column Explanation
ID Unique identifier of the row.
Name A short descriptive name for this row. Used when making a reference to this row.
Timestamp Time when the row was added.
User Who added the row (first name)
Subject Name or identifier of the thing we are talking about
Evaluation One of the relations listed below. The content goes to column Object.
  • Truth: Either True or False
  • Probability: A value between 0 and 1
  • Better than: An item or relation that is worse than subject
  • More important than: An item or relation that is less important than subject
  • Utility: A value between 0 (least preferred choice) and 1 (most preferred choice)
Object Name or identifier of a thing, or number (see above)
Description Verbal description of the content of the row.
Evaluations(-)
ObsIDNameTimestampUserSubjectEvaluationObjectDescription
1
  • --# : Add links to pages that belong to this assessment. --Jouni (talk) 11:36, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

+ Show code

See also

Articles in Wikipedia